Skip to content
Trainer profile

Keiran Burke

588 runners in the last 5 seasons · 78 individual horses
As at 26 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 3 days ago
from 1 Jan 2022
66–588
Wins / Runs
11.2%
Strike rate
n=588
156 (27%)
Placed
1.10
n=586 · 0.94 incl. margin
−92.91
£1 level stake
n=588 at SP · −15.8%
£786k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
9.2%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 120 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 11% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.10).

Deterministic profile computed from 588 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 26 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fires Sep–Oct 32.1% when favourite Josephine Gordon: 10.8% from 148 Claiming riders: 11.6% Sends off the favourite in 10% of races
The read

The record is strongest at Fontwell (23.5%, n=34) and Newton Abbot (22%, n=41) — all clear of the yard's 11.2% baseline. Debutants struggle at 3.3% (n=30, Fair A/E 0.98). Josephine Gordon rides 25% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (10.8%, A/E 1.65) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good going (18.8%, n=207). 2 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Ladbrokes Desert Orchid Handicap Chase at Kempton (Dec 2024, £57,218). The stable star of the record: Soul Icon (GB) — 9 wins from 37 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Sep–Oct.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 11.2% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
10.2%−1.0
n=128 · A/E 1.24 · £1 −47.50
New recruits · first run for the yard
10.8%−0.4
n=37 · A/E 1.69 · £1 −15.00
Debutants · first career start
3.3%−7.9
n=30 · A/E 0.98 · £1 +11.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−11.2
n=27 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −27.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
14.3%+3.1
n=7 · A/E 2.19 · £1 +2.50
When favourite
32.1%
n=56 · A/E 1.03 · £1 −5.74
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
11.6%+0.4
n=146 · A/E 0.98 · £1 −50.39
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
8.3%−2.9
n=12 · A/E 1.59 · £1 +5.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On last-time-out winners 32.3% vs 11.2% · n=65
With Gavin Sheehan 26.3% vs 11.2% · n=38
At Fontwell 23.5% vs 11.2% · n=34
On Good going 18.8% vs 11.2% · n=207
At Newton Abbot 22% vs 11.2% · n=41
With C&D winners 19.3% vs 11.2% · n=88
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 252 25 9.9% +1.54
Hurdle 205 29 14.1% −85.45
Chase 89 10 11.2% −12.00
NH Flat 42 2 4.8% +3.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 207 39 18.8% +22.86
Standard (AW) 176 18 10.2% −10.84
Good to Soft 86 6 7% −31.43
Soft 63 2 3.2% −20.38
Good to Firm 34 1 2.9% −31.12
Heavy 20 0 0% −20.00
Firm 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Kempton (AW) 78 14 17.9% +50.33
Taunton 48 4 8.3% −8.88
Wincanton 41 3 7.3% −28.88
Newton Abbot 41 9 22% +0.58
Lingfield (AW) 37 1 2.7% −33.00
Exeter 35 3 8.6% −23.00
Fontwell 34 8 23.5% −0.46
Wolverhampton (AW) 26 0 0% −26.00
Worcester 18 0 0% −18.00
Chepstow 17 2 11.8% −9.62
Salisbury 16 1 6.3% +1.00
Southwell (AW) 16 1 6.3% −8.50
Chelmsford City (AW) 15 1 6.7% −10.67
Kempton 15 3 20% +47.00
Bath 14 1 7.1% −2.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 5 214 22 10.3% −45.15
Class 4 171 24 14% −50.26
Class 6 104 9 8.7% −29.17
Class 3 44 7 15.9% +41.17
Class 2 35 3 8.6% −6.50
Class 1 20 1 5% −3.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 66 21 31.8% 1.09 −4.86
2nd–3rd fav 122 19 15.6% 0.91 −42.38
4th–6th fav 183 19 10.4% 1.38 +16.33
7th+ in betting 217 7 3.2% 1.20 −62.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Vitalline (GB)from Ben James 54 5 15 30 Sep 26
Whitcombe Rockstar (GB)from Ben James 32 9 11 5 Sep 26
Soul Icon (GB) 30 7 15 23 Oct 26
Stacey Racey (GB) 27 2 7 11 Aug 26
Sam's Amour (GB) 24 3 8 13 Jul 26
Danzini (IRE) 23 2 9 20 Nov 25
The Height Of Fame (GB) 23 7 10 29 Sep 25
Stiletto (GB)from Ben James · then Sophie Leech 22 0 4 3 Dec 24
Maroochi (GB)from Alan King 20 1 9 5 Jul 24
Zoffandia (IRE)from William Haggas 16 2 4 30 Sep 26
Love Actually (IRE) 16 4 5 5 Jun 24
Mishy's Star (GB) 13 0 1 7 Jul 26
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 78 horses sent out in this window — each ran at least 2 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 30 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Ben James (3) and Roger Fell (3); 30 had their first archived run for this yard.

17 have since run for another yard, most often for Gary Harrison (5); 43 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 3
Only 3 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
9912112110155181467
Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderJosephine Gordon
25% of all rides
10.8% SR · A/E 1.65
RiderRWSR£1
Josephine Gordon 148 16 10.8% +24.16
Harry Kimber 82 15 18.3% −21.51
Tom Bellamy 56 3 5.4% −31.50
Gavin Sheehan 38 10 26.3% +37.29
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2011→
99
Archived wins
2
Pattern / graded wins
£1.12m
Prize money
2024
Best season · 19 wins
Soul Icon (GB) — Ladbrokes Desert Orchid Handicap Chase (Grade 2) (Limited Handicap Chase) (GBB Race) Kempton · Dec 2024 · Grade 2
£57,218
Whitcombe Rockstar (GB) — Unibet London Mile Series Final Handicap Kempton (AW) · Sep 2024 · Class 2
£36,078
Hunt Ball (IRE) — Pulteney Land Investments Novices' Handicap Chase (Listed) Cheltenham · Mar 2012 · Listed
£28,475

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Due Diligence (USA) 9.6% · 7–73
Progeny have won 10.3% of 2,548 runs since 2008 (193 horses).
Sixties Icon (GB) 18.4% · 7–38
Progeny have won 10% of 5,667 runs since 2008 (337 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 13.3% from 264. Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 6.4% from 1,332.
Bated Breath (GB) 5.4% · 2–37
Progeny have won 10.8% of 8,143 runs since 2008 (670 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 7.7% from 849.
Footstepsinthesand (GB) 28.1% · 9–32
Progeny have won 10.2% of 12,790 runs since 2008 (937 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 6.9% from 320.
Ocovango (GB) 7.4% · 2–27
Progeny have won 9.5% of 2,991 runs since 2008 (304 horses). Strongest beyond 3m (all codes): 14% from 193.
Black Sam Bellamy (IRE) 11.5% · 3–26
Progeny have won 10.3% of 4,683 runs since 2008 (466 horses). Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 5.5% from 145.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 26 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 990 · newest first

The latest 50 of 990 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 1 November 2011 to 23 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
03 Sep 26 Salisbury Zoffandia (IRE)J: Josephine Gordon Madar Corporation Handicap StakesClass 3 · 8f · Good To Soft · 11 ran 10th 100/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Keiran Burke's strike rate?
Keiran Burke has won 66 of 588 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 11.2% (as at 26 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Keiran Burke do best at?
Fontwell by strike rate: 8 wins from 34 runners (23.5%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Keiran Burke?
Josephine Gordon, with 148 runners since 2022 — 25% of the total. That pairing has won 16 (10.8%).
Is Keiran Burke in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 3 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Keiran Burke's Fair A/E?
1.10, from 586 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 26 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).