Paul Nicholls
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 510 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 22% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.04). Debutants are a strength: 29% on first career starts (158 runs).
The record is strongest at Taunton (31%, n=197) and Newton Abbot (30.2%, n=149) — all clear of the yard's 21.7% baseline. It is weakest at Cheltenham (9.8% over 183 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants strike at 29.1% (n=158, Fair A/E 1.11), but a horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a poor signal at 17.5% (n=40, Fair A/E 1.07). A horse in first-time headgear are the standout value angle: 23.1% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.22 and +2.57 to a £1 stake over 134 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Harry Cobden rides 54% of the entries and edges the yard's average (23.8% vs 21.7%, A/E 1.02) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well on Good to Firm going (41.7%, n=36). The record reads poorly in Class 2 — 15.2% over 446 runners, 6.5pts below the baseline. 361 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the John Smith's Grand National Chase at Aintree (Apr 2012, £547,268). The stable star of the record: Big Buck's (FR) — 21 wins from 27 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires May–Jul.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 21.7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 21.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 12,857 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 12,857 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 22 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Paul Nicholls's strike rate?
- Paul Nicholls has won 550 of 2,533 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 21.7% (as at 28 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Paul Nicholls do best at?
- Taunton by strike rate: 61 wins from 197 runners (31%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Paul Nicholls?
- Harry Cobden, with 1,368 runners since 2022 — 54% of the total. That pairing has won 325 (23.8%).
- Is Paul Nicholls in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 4 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Paul Nicholls's Fair A/E?
- 1.04, from 2,527 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.