Skip to content
Trainer profile

G Nakouzi

50 runners in the last 5 seasons · 19 individual horses
As at 25 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 26 days ago 94% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
1–50
Wins / Runs
2%
Strike rate
n=50
6 (12%)
Placed
0.57
n=50 · 0.46 incl. margin
−45.00
£1 level stake
n=50 at SP · −90.0%
£32,226
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
4.8%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−2.0
n=17 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −17.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−2.0
n=17 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −17.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−2.0
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−2.0
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−2.0
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−2.0
n=19 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −19.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−2.0
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With a new jockey booking 0% vs 2% · n=32
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 47 1 2.1% −42.00
Hurdle 3 0 0% −3.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good to Soft 15 0 0% −15.00
Soft 14 1 7.1% −9.00
Standard (AW) 11 0 0% −11.00
Good 7 0 0% −7.00
Heavy 2 0 0% −2.00
Good to Firm 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 12 0 0% −12.00
Chantilly 11 0 0% −11.00
Longchamp (FR) 11 0 0% −11.00
Saint-Cloud 8 0 0% −8.00
Clairefontaine (FR) 4 0 0% −4.00
Compiegne (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00
Dieppe (FR) 1 1 100% +4.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 3 4 0 0% −4.00
Class 1 3 0 0% −3.00
Class 4 3 1 33.3% +2.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav 4 1 25% 2.26 +1.00
4th–6th fav 7 0 0% 0.00 −7.00
7th+ in betting 39 0 0% 0.00 −39.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Neowise (USA)from Gianluca Bietolini 8 0 3 7 Jul 26
Black Lives Matter (FR)from M Nigge 6 1 2 29 Sep 26
Blue Hunt (FR)from F Vermeulen 5 0 1 2 Oct 25
La Frenchie (GB)from Mme A Budka 3 0 0 26 Mar 26
Game On (FR)from Carina Fey 3 0 0 21 Sep 24
Spezial (GB)from Alicja Karkosa 2 0 0 22 May 25
Eygalieres (IRE)from J Piednoel 2 0 0 7 Apr 25
Honky Tonk Woman (FR)from Julien Phelippon · then Mme A Budka 2 0 0 21 Sep 24
Whiland (FR)from Yoann Bonnefoy · then Giada Menato 2 0 0 4 Jul 24
All 19 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 19 horses listed, 16 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Alicja Karkosa (2) and Fabian Xaver Weissmeier (2); 3 had their first archived run for this yard.

8 have since run for another yard, most often for Joao Pedro Macedo Da Costa Oliveira (3); 11 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
0·0000002000·
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Giovanni Sias 8 0 0% −8.00
Delphine Santiago 6 0 0% −6.00
Theo Bachelot 5 0 0% −5.00
Benjamin Marie 4 0 0% −4.00
Marvin Grandin 3 1 33.3% +2.00
Jerome Moutard 3 0 0% −3.00
Mme Camille Collet-Vidal 3 0 0% −3.00
Tony Piccone 2 0 0% −2.00
Nicolas Baudet 2 0 0% −2.00
Mme Marie Velon 2 0 0% −2.00
Gary Sanchez 2 0 0% −2.00
Joel Phelippe 1 0 0% −1.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2024→
1
Archived wins
£32,226
Prize money
2026
Best season · 1 win
Black Lives Matter (FR) — Prix De Pornichet Dieppe (FR) · Sep 2026 · Class 4
£5,750
Notable horses

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Recoletos (FR) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 9.1% of 799 runs since 2008 (113 horses).
Anodin (IRE) 0% · 0–6
Progeny have won 8.8% of 2,414 runs since 2008 (274 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 3.4% from 116.
Panis (USA) 16.7% · 1–6
Progeny have won 8.4% of 1,976 runs since 2008 (211 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 12.3% from 146. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 4.3% from 116.
Bated Breath (GB) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 10.8% of 8,141 runs since 2008 (670 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 7.7% from 847.
Almanzor (FR) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 9.6% of 2,095 runs since 2008 (282 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 16.2% from 154. Weakest on Heavy going: 4.8% from 147. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 13% from 301.
Havana Gold (IRE) 0% · 0–3
Progeny have won 9.5% of 5,056 runs since 2008 (402 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 4.3% from 117. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 13% from 523. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 6.2% from 177.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 25 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

all 50 archived runs · newest first

Every one of G Nakouzi's 50 archived runners, from 9 May 2024 to 29 September 2026, newest first — one winner among them.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
29 Sep 26 Chantilly (FR) Black Lives Matter (FR)J: Marvin Grandin Prix Du Salon Des CondeClass 3 · 9.5f · Good To Soft · 14 ran PU 14/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is G Nakouzi's strike rate?
G Nakouzi has won 1 of 50 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 2% (as at 25 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
What is G Nakouzi's Fair A/E?
0.57, from 50 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 25 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).