Owen Burrows
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 130 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 20% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.17). The edge shows sharpest with horses returning fresh: 29% off breaks of two months or more (137 runs).
The record is strongest at Newbury (29.8%, n=57), clear of the yard's 20.3% baseline. Horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a positive signal at 28.5% (n=137, Fair A/E 1.41), but a horse in first-time headgear has been a poor signal at 7.5% (n=40, Fair A/E 0.58). In Group and Graded company the record are the standout value angle: 25.9% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.51 and +66.45 to a £1 stake over 135 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Jim Crowley rides 23% of the entries and beats the yard's average (27.5% vs 20.3%, A/E 1.59) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well off a break of 180+ days (28.6%, n=70). The record reads poorly in Class 5 — 12.9% over 163 runners, 7.4pts below the baseline. 48 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Qipco Champion Stakes at Ascot (Oct 2024, £737,230). The stable star of the record: Hukum (IRE) — 10 wins from 16 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Jul–Aug.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 20.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 20.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2016→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,458 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,458 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 March 2016 to 17 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Owen Burrows's strike rate?
- Owen Burrows has won 128 of 629 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 20.3% (as at 19 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Owen Burrows do best at?
- Newbury by strike rate: 17 wins from 57 runners (29.8%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Owen Burrows?
- Jim Crowley, with 142 runners since 2022 — 23% of the total. That pairing has won 39 (27.5%).
- Is Owen Burrows in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 9 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Owen Burrows's Fair A/E?
- 1.17, from 625 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.