Christopher Head
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 110 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 22% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.22). Horses in first-time headgear strike at 29% (31 runs, true-first definition).
The record is strongest at Saint-Cloud (30.5%, n=95), clear of the yard's 22.1% baseline. It is weakest at Chantilly (16.8% over 190 runners) — the largest sample in the record, and the widest gap. A horse in first-time headgear has been a positive signal at 29% (n=31, Fair A/E 2.04), but runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 16.7% (n=36, Fair A/E 1.38). Debutants are the standout value angle: 20.9% strikes only just below baseline, but Fair A/E 1.20 and +0.52 to a £1 stake over 148 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Aurelien Lemaitre rides 50% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (21.6%, A/E 1.24) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (28.5%, n=144) and over 6f – 7f (27.9%, n=183). The record reads poorly on Standard (AW) going — 15.5% over 155 runners, 6.6pts below the baseline. 50 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Queen Elizabeth II Stakes at Ascot (Oct 2023, £655,709). The stable star of the record: Blue Rose Cen (IRE) — 7 wins from 11 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires May–Jul.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 22.1% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 22.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2018→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 603 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 603 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 13 December 2018 to 19 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Christopher Head's strike rate?
- Christopher Head has won 124 of 560 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 22.1% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Christopher Head do best at?
- Saint-Cloud by strike rate: 29 wins from 95 runners (30.5%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Christopher Head?
- Aurelien Lemaitre, with 282 runners since 2022 — 50% of the total. That pairing has won 61 (21.6%).
- Is Christopher Head in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 9 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Christopher Head's Fair A/E?
- 1.22, from 560 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.