P & J Brandt
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 60 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 12% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.10). New recruits from other yards win at 19% first time out (73 runs).
New recruits from other stables on their first run win at 19.2% (n=73, Fair A/E 1.78), but runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 4.4% (n=45, Fair A/E 0.80). Horses returning fresh after 61+ days are the standout value angle: 14.6% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.44 and +104.35 to a £1 stake over 240 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. The market has consistently overbet in Group and Graded company the record: 6.4% strike, Fair A/E 0.65 and −64.52 to a £1 stake over 140 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Maxime Guyon rides 40% of the entries and edges the yard's average (16.9% vs 12%, A/E 1.21) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (17.3%, n=249). 9 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix de Sandringham at Chantilly (FR) (Jun 2020, £48,885). The stable star of the record: Clavus (FR) — 8 wins from 27 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Aug–Sep.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 12% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 12% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2020→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,108 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,108 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 6 June 2020 to 9 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is P & J Brandt's strike rate?
- P & J Brandt has won 133 of 1,108 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 12% (as at 12 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does P & J Brandt do best at?
- Saint-Cloud by strike rate: 35 wins from 204 runners (17.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for P & J Brandt?
- Maxime Guyon, with 445 runners since 2008 — 40% of the total. That pairing has won 75 (16.9%).
- Is P & J Brandt in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 9 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is P & J Brandt's Fair A/E?
- 1.10, from 1,106 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.