Toby McCain-Mitchell
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 20 times a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning on 16% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.12). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 21% (53 rides).
Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 20.8% (n=53, Fair A/E 1.06), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 6.8% (n=44, Fair A/E 1.10). First rides on a horse are the standout value angle: 16.4% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.20 and +20.50 to a £1 stake over 207 rides — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Nigel & Willy Twiston-Davies supplies 23% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (17.5%, A/E 1.13) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The rider also reads well in Class 3 (22.5%, n=40) and over 2m1f – 2m4f (19.1%, n=94). The record reads poorly off a 61-180-day break — 11.1% over 36 rides, 4.9pts below the baseline.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 16% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 16% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
SteadyBy month
strike by month, lifetimeRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2020→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 344 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 344 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 28 January 2020 to 10 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 12 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 7 runs (won 0, 1 did not run) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 4 runs (won 1) · fastest on KTB Speed in 2 runs (won 0) · to 7 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Toby McCain-Mitchell's strike rate?
- Toby McCain-Mitchell has won 55 of 344 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 16% (as at 12 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which yard does Toby McCain-Mitchell ride most for?
- Nigel & Willy Twiston-Davies, with 80 rides since 2008 — 23% of the total. That pairing has won 14 (17.5%).
- Is Toby McCain-Mitchell in form?
- In the last 14 days: 15 rides, 2 winners, a strike rate of 13.3%. That is in line with the baseline of 16% since 2008.
- What is Toby McCain-Mitchell's Fair A/E?
- 1.12, from 342 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.