Skip to content
Trainer profile

Sam Allwood

317 runners in the last 5 seasons · 53 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 6 days ago 100% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
13–317
Wins / Runs
4.1%
Strike rate
n=317
54 (17%)
Placed
0.54
n=315 · 0.46 incl. margin
−211.29
£1 level stake
n=317 at SP · −66.7%
£186k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
11.1%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 60 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.54). With a claiming rider up the record reads 6% (79 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 317 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Charlie Todd: 0% from 79 Claiming riders: 6.3%
The read

Charlie Todd rides 25% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (0% vs 4.1%, A/E 0.00). The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (7.6%, n=92) and over 2m1f – 2m4f (7.4%, n=121). The record reads poorly over 2m5f – 3m — 0% over 57 runners, 4.1pts below the baseline.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 4.1% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
3.6%−0.5
n=83 · A/E 0.65 · £1 −29.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
8.3%+4.2
n=12 · A/E 1.79 · £1 +14.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−4.1
n=25 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −25.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−4.1
n=18 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −18.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−4.1
n=13 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −13.00
When favourite
30%
n=10 · A/E 1.10 · £1 −2.04
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
6.3%+2.2
n=79 · A/E 0.65 · £1 −35.50

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 4.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With Charlie Todd 0% vs 4.1% · n=79
Over 2m5f – 3m 0% vs 4.1% · n=57
On Good to Soft going 7.6% vs 4.1% · n=92
Over 2m1f – 2m4f 7.4% vs 4.1% · n=121
With horses switching code 0% vs 4.1% · n=41
With Alan Johns 8.3% vs 4.1% · n=36
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 167 5 3% −120.29
Chase 138 8 5.8% −79.00
NH Flat 12 0 0% −12.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 140 4 2.9% −119.25
Good to Soft 92 7 7.6% −32.92
Soft 71 2 2.8% −45.12
Heavy 13 0 0% −13.00
Good to Firm 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Bangor-on-Dee 40 1 2.5% −33.00
Uttoxeter 38 0 0% −38.00
Huntingdon 30 2 6.7% −23.62
Southwell 29 2 6.9% +4.50
Doncaster 29 0 0% −29.00
Market Rasen 19 1 5.3% −14.00
Worcester 18 0 0% −18.00
Hereford 16 0 0% −16.00
Catterick 16 1 6.3% −9.00
Ludlow 14 0 0% −14.00
Warwick 10 1 10% −6.75
Sedgefield 8 2 25% −2.25
Wetherby 7 1 14.3% +6.00
Ayr 7 1 14.3% +16.00
Chepstow 4 0 0% −4.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 5 176 7 4% −114.12
Class 4 117 6 5.1% −73.17
Class 3 22 0 0% −22.00
Class 2 1 0 0% −1.00
Class 6 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 11 3 27.3% 1.04 −3.04
2nd–3rd fav 57 5 8.8% 0.51 −35.75
4th–6th fav 113 4 3.5% 0.49 −49.50
7th+ in betting 136 1 0.7% 0.33 −123.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
74.4% completed · 305 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 138 77.5% 5 3 22 1 0
Hurdle 167 71.9% 2 3 41 0 1
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Kings Justice (GB) 22 1 5 6 Nov 25
Rehill Relic (IRE) 17 2 5 27 Feb 26
King Of The Hill (IRE) 16 0 4 27 Jul 25
Lepashe (IRE) 15 0 2 14 Dec 24
Orbys River (IRE) 14 2 5 14 Apr 25
Rockvale (IRE) 13 1 2 12 Oct 26
Little Pi (FR)from Matt Sheppard 13 1 4 11 Oct 26
Money For Jam (IRE) 11 0 1 10 Apr 24
Out On The Tear (IRE) 11 0 4 13 Mar 24
Bitasweetsymphony (IRE) 11 0 3 16 Nov 23
Aquila Sky (IRE)from Harry Fry 10 0 1 20 Feb 25
Howyouplaythegame (FR) 9 0 2 14 Apr 24
All 53 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 53 horses listed, 20 arrived from another yard in our archive; 33 had their first archived run for this yard.

4 have since run for another yard; 49 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 5
Only 5 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
3293600005010
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderCharlie Todd
25% of all rides
0% SR · A/E 0.00
RiderRWSR£1
Charlie Todd 79 0 0% −79.00
Toby Wynne 68 5 7.4% −23.17
Alan Johns 36 3 8.3% −25.00
Craig Nichol 32 0 0% −32.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2014→
30
Archived wins
£299k
Prize money
2021
Best season · 6 wins
Bempton Cliffs (IRE) — Fairfield Handicap Chase Sedgefield · Oct 2022 · Class 4
£6,808
Sheneededtherun (IRE) — Sky Sports Racing On Sky 415 Mares' Handicap Chase Southwell · Nov 2019 · Class 4
£5,458
Irandando Has (FR) — Guinness Draught Novices' Hurdle (GBB Race) Newcastle · Mar 2026 · Class 4
£5,446

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Mahler (GB) 7.1% · 2–28
Progeny have won 10.8% of 8,837 runs since 2008 (784 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 15.1% from 119.
Arcadio (GER) 0% · 0–25
Progeny have won 9.2% of 3,977 runs since 2008 (375 horses).
Ol' Man River (IRE) 9.1% · 2–22
Progeny have won 7.3% of 506 runs since 2008 (57 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 10.8% from 102. Weakest on Good going: 4.1% from 171.
Pether's Moon (IRE) 4.5% · 1–22
Progeny have won 13.2% of 902 runs since 2008 (106 horses).
Ocovango (GB) 0% · 0–21
Progeny have won 9.5% of 2,982 runs since 2008 (302 horses). Strongest beyond 3m (all codes): 14.1% from 191.
Kingston Hill (GB) 0% · 0–16
Progeny have won 9.1% of 1,629 runs since 2008 (203 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5.5% from 164.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 496 · newest first

The latest 50 of 496 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 May 2014 to 16 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Sam Allwood's strike rate?
Sam Allwood has won 13 of 317 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 4.1% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Sam Allwood do best at?
Huntingdon by strike rate: 2 wins from 30 runners (6.7%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Sam Allwood?
Charlie Todd, with 79 runners since 2022 — 25% of the total. That pairing has won 0 (0%).
Is Sam Allwood in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Sam Allwood's Fair A/E?
0.54, from 315 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).