Skip to content
Trainer profile

T Larriviere

171 runners in the lifetime window · 63 individual horses
As at 15 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Jul 2014 95% of runners on the flat
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
18–171
Wins / Runs
10.5%
Strike rate
n=171
36 (21%)
Placed
1.27
Fair A/E
n=116 · 1.27 incl. margin
+19.20
£1 level stake
n=122 at SP · +15.7%
£508k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
14.3%
KTB Yard Profile

Sent out around 20 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 11% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.27). Debutants are a strength: 13% on first career starts (46 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 171 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 15 Oct 2026
The read

The yard also read well off a 15-30-day break (15.4%, n=39). The market has also underrated the yard over 1m2f – 1m4f: Fair A/E 2.04 across 68 runners (13.2% strike, +4.10 to a £1 stake). The record read poorly over 1m – 1m1f — 4.8% over 42 runners, 5.7pts below the baseline. 3 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Prix Georges Trabaud at Marseille Borely (FR) (May 2009, £26,699). The stable star of the record was Fantastic Love (FR) — 5 wins from 14 runs for the yard.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 10.5% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
8.9%−1.6
n=56 · A/E 1.81 · £1 +38.60
New recruits · first run for the yard
5.6%−4.9
n=18 · A/E 1.31 · £1 −6.10
Debutants · first career start
13%+2.5
n=46 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.50
First-time headgear · true-first definition
13%+2.5
n=23 · A/E 1.17 · £1 −1.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−10.5
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
When favourite
66.7%
n=6 · A/E 1.69 · £1 +19.80
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−10.5
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
7.7%−2.8
n=39 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −22.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 10.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 1m – 1m1f 4.8% vs 10.5% · n=42
Off a 15-30-day break 15.4% vs 10.5% · n=39
Over 1m2f – 1m4f 13.2% vs 10.5% · n=68
In Class 1 7.7% vs 10.5% · n=39
In Group / Graded races 7.7% vs 10.5% · n=39
With debutants 13% vs 10.5% · n=46
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 163 16 9.8% +6.20
Hurdle 6 2 33.3% +14.00
Chase 2 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 55 5 9.1% +18.10
Soft 37 3 8.1% −21.70
Good 35 4 11.4% −8.40
Good to Soft 30 4 13.3% +15.00
Heavy 13 2 15.4% +17.20

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Deauville (FR) 37 4 10.8% +30.10
Saint-Cloud 22 3 13.6% +20.20
Longchamp (FR) 19 0 0% −17.00
Chantilly (FR) 19 1 5.3% −8.80
Marseille Borely 18 2 11.1% −8.00
Cagnes-Sur-Mer 13 1 7.7% −5.00
Vichy 9 3 33.3% −1.70
Lyon Parilly 8 0 0% −4.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 5 0 0% −4.00
Marseille Pont-de-Vivaux 4 0 0% −1.00
Aix-Les-Bains 2 0 0% −1.00
Auteuil (FR) 2 0 0% −1.00
Enghien (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Nimes 2 1 50% —
Compiegne (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 39 3 7.7% −22.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 6 4 66.7% 1.69 +19.80
2nd–3rd fav 12 0 0% 0.00 −12.00
4th–6th fav 43 5 11.6% 1.59 +5.50
7th+ in betting 61 3 4.9% 1.43 +5.90
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Sirene Doree (FR)from an unnamed yard 15 2 8 7 May 14
Fantastic Love (FR)then J-M Capitte 14 5 7 24 Apr 14
Broken In Light (FR) 13 1 2 20 Jun 10
Zor (FR)then J-M Capitte 10 1 2 3 Dec 13
Fly Tartare (FR) 9 0 2 6 Jun 13
Broken Kitten (FR) 9 1 3 10 Sep 10
Footstepsinthecity (FR) 6 1 1 20 Aug 13
Kelty In Love (FR) 6 1 1 27 Apr 10
Bright Cat (FR) 4 0 0 18 Apr 12
Reve Tartare (FR) 4 0 0 10 Jun 11
Unquenchable Fire (IRE)from C Ferland · then Alex Fracas 4 0 0 21 Sep 10
Duo Victorieux (FR)then N Minner 4 0 0 14 Jun 10
The 60 most-raced of 63 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 16 arrived from another yard in our archive; 44 had their first archived run for this yard.

17 have since run for another yard, most often for J-M Capitte (2); 43 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
1517108150121760020
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderGuillaume Millet
19% of all rides
12.1% SR · A/E 0.00
RiderRWSR£1
Guillaume Millet 33 4 12.1% −8.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
20
Archived wins
3
Pattern / graded wins
£574k
Prize money
2013
Best season · 7 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Broken In Light (FR) — Prix Georges Trabaud () Marseille Borely (FR) · May 2009 · Listed
£26,699
Broken Kitten (FR) — Prix des Jouvenceaux et des Jouvencelles () Vichy (FR) · Jul 2009 · Listed
£26,699
Kelty In Love (FR) — Prix des Reves d'Or - Jacques Bouchara () Vichy (FR) · Jul 2009 · Listed
£26,699

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Kingsalsa (USA) 12.5% · 2–16
Progeny have won 9.3% of 2,989 runs since 2008 (284 horses). Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 12.7% from 110.
Divine Light (JPN) 13.3% · 2–15
Progeny have won 6.7% of 330 runs since 2008 (32 horses). Strongest on Standard (AW) going: 10.3% from 107.
Azamour (IRE) 35.7% · 5–14
Progeny have won 13.1% of 4,328 runs since 2008 (351 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 8.8% from 215.
Tot Ou Tard (IRE) 10% · 1–10
Progeny have won 16% of 200 runs since 2008 (27 horses).
Greengroom (FR) 0% · 0–9
Progeny have won 10.3% of 29 runs since 2008 (8 horses). A small sample.
Martaline (GB) 11.1% · 1–9
Progeny have won 14.2% of 7,339 runs since 2008 (723 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 9.4% from 128. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 10% from 120.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 183 · newest first

The latest 50 of 183 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 12 March 2005 to 11 July 2014.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is T Larriviere's strike rate?
T Larriviere has won 18 of 171 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 10.5% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does T Larriviere do best at?
Deauville (FR) by strike rate: 4 wins from 37 runners (10.8%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is T Larriviere's Fair A/E?
1.27, from 116 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 15 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).