Daniel Tudhope
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 540 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 16% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.07). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 21% (1,291 rides). Rides mostly for David O'Meara — 47% of rides in the window.
It is weakest at Ascot (8.3% over 312 rides) — the widest gap in the record. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 21.3% (n=1,291, Fair A/E 1.05), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 9.4% (n=1,907, Fair A/E 1.15). David O'Meara supplies 47% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (15.2%, A/E 1.03) — the market has that partnership priced right. 101 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the Queen Anne Stakes at Ascot (Jun 2019, £340,260). The standout partner of the record: Summerghand (IRE) — 10 wins from 46 rides together. Seasonally, the rider fires Jul–Aug.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 15.8% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 15.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstBy month
strike by month, lifetimeRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 11,474 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 11,474 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 17 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 6 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 5 runs (won 0) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 7 runs (won 3) · fastest on KTB Speed in 2 runs (won 0) · to 16 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Daniel Tudhope's strike rate?
- Daniel Tudhope has won 1,626 of 10,282 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 15.8% (as at 14 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Daniel Tudhope do best at?
- Ripon by strike rate: 100 wins from 451 rides (22.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Daniel Tudhope ride most for?
- David O'Meara, with 4,859 rides since 2008 — 47% of the total. That pairing has won 739 (15.2%).
- What is Daniel Tudhope's Fair A/E?
- 1.07, from 10,224 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.