Ollie Sangster
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 210 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 13% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.02). The yard is quiet just now — 1 winner in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
Debutants struggle at 6.9% (n=160, Fair A/E 0.79). Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 1 from 22 runners in the last 14 days (4.5%, 8.7pts below the 13.2% baseline). Nicola Currie rides 9% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (6.4% vs 13.2%, A/E 0.74). The record reads poorly in Class 4 — 7.5% over 279 runners, 5.7pts below the baseline. 7 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the BetMGM All-Weather 3 Year Old Championships Handicap at Newcastle (AW) (Apr 2026, £77,310). The stable star of the record: Tuco Salamanca (IRE) — 8 wins from 22 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Apr–May.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2023→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,037 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,037 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 1 April 2023 to 29 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 5 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 7 runs (won 1) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 1) · fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 24 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Ollie Sangster's strike rate?
- Ollie Sangster has won 137 of 1,037 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 13.2% (as at 30 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Ollie Sangster do best at?
- Wolverhampton (AW) by strike rate: 22 wins from 131 runners (16.8%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Ollie Sangster?
- Nicola Currie, with 94 runners since 2022 — 9% of the total. That pairing has won 6 (6.4%).
- Is Ollie Sangster in form?
- In the last 14 days: 22 runners, 1 winner, a strike rate of 4.5%. That is below the baseline of 13.2% since 2022.
- What is Ollie Sangster's Fair A/E?
- 1.02, from 1,027 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.