Scott McCullagh
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Rides around 140 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 7% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.97). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 13% (45 rides).
It is weakest at Galway (0% over 35 rides) — the widest gap in the record. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 13.3% (n=45, Fair A/E 1.04). The market has consistently overbet first rides on a horse: 5.1% strike, Fair A/E 0.78 and −242.51 to a £1 stake over 415 rides — those runners underperform what the price implies. Mrs J. Harrington supplies 29% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (7.4%, A/E 0.86). The rider also reads well off a 0-7-day break (15.2%, n=33) and at trips under 6f (13.5%, n=37). 5 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the XIN GIN Irish EBF Brownstown Stakes at Leopardstown (Jul 2026, £42,000). The standout partner of the record: Aurora Princess (IRE) — 5 wins from 14 rides together.
Riding patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses ridden
same window as header · most-raced firstBy month
strike by month, 5 seasonsRiding for
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2016→Sires of the horses ridden
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,372 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,372 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 23 December 2016 to 9 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this rider’s mounts since 7 Oct 2026: fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 7 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Scott McCullagh's strike rate?
- Scott McCullagh has won 49 of 701 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 7% (as at 1 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Scott McCullagh do best at?
- Limerick by strike rate: 4 wins from 33 rides (12.1%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Which yard does Scott McCullagh ride most for?
- Mrs J. Harrington, with 204 rides since 2022 — 29% of the total. That pairing has won 15 (7.4%).
- What is Scott McCullagh's Fair A/E?
- 0.97, from 701 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.