Thomas Mullins
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 140 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 7% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.93). With a claiming rider up the record reads 8% (244 runs).
The record is strongest at Clonmel (11.5%, n=52), clear of the yard's 6.5% baseline. In Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 0% (n=56, Fair A/E 0.00). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 3.8% strike, Fair A/E 0.65 and −81.00 to a £1 stake over 104 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Danny Mullins rides 17% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (7.1%, A/E 0.73). The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (13.9%, n=36). The record reads poorly in Class 1 — 0% over 59 runners, 6.5pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 2m5f – 3m: Fair A/E 0.37 across 76 runners (2.6% strike, −55.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 37 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Whitewater Champion Stayers' Hurdle at Punchestown (Apr 2006, £124,000). The stable star of the record: Fosters Cross (IRE) — 13 wins from 104 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Sep–Oct.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,652 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,652 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 6 January 2005 to 20 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Thomas Mullins's strike rate?
- Thomas Mullins has won 44 of 676 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 6.5% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Thomas Mullins do best at?
- Clonmel by strike rate: 6 wins from 52 runners (11.5%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Thomas Mullins?
- Danny Mullins, with 112 runners since 2022 — 17% of the total. That pairing has won 8 (7.1%).
- Is Thomas Mullins in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 9 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Thomas Mullins's Fair A/E?
- 0.93, from 676 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.