Henry de Bromhead
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 730 runners a season, winning with 14% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.00). Horses with headgear back on after a bare run strike at 20% (45 runs). The yard is in form now — 7 winners in the last fortnight, above its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Down Royal (24.7%, n=97) and Clonmel (23.4%, n=111) — all clear of the yard's 13.9% baseline. It is weakest at Curragh (2.3% over 88 runners) — the widest gap in the record. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a positive signal at 20% (n=45, Fair A/E 1.65), but in Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 10.9% (n=752, Fair A/E 0.96). Right now the yard is firing: 7 winners from 36 runners in the last 14 days (19.4%, 5.5pts above the 13.9% baseline). Rachael Blackmore rides 29% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (15.8%, A/E 0.95). 231 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Randox Grand National Handicap Chase at Aintree (Apr 2021, £375,000). The stable star of the record: Sizing Europe (IRE) — 22 wins from 45 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Jul–Aug.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.9% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
In formWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 9,967 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 9,967 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 9 January 2005 to 19 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Henry de Bromhead's strike rate?
- Henry de Bromhead has won 508 of 3,657 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 13.9% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Henry de Bromhead do best at?
- Clonmel by strike rate: 26 wins from 111 runners (23.4%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Henry de Bromhead?
- Rachael Blackmore, with 1,048 runners since 2022 — 29% of the total. That pairing has won 166 (15.8%).
- Is Henry de Bromhead in form?
- In the last 14 days: 36 runners, 7 winners, a strike rate of 19.4%. That is above the baseline of 13.9% since 2022.
- What is Henry de Bromhead's Fair A/E?
- 1.00, from 3,655 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.