Chris Honour
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 20 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 11% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.22). With a claiming rider up the record reads 16% (81 runs).
Runners with a claiming rider up have been a positive signal at 16% (n=81, Fair A/E 1.29), but horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 8.1% (n=86, Fair A/E 1.17). Bryan Carver rides 66% of the entries and edges the yard's average (13.2% vs 11.2%, A/E 1.39) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well in Class 3 (22.6%, n=31) and in Chase races (18.1%, n=138). The record reads poorly on Good to Soft going — 3.7% over 81 runners, 7.5pts below the baseline. The stable star of the record: Time To Bite (IRE) — 10 wins from 36 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2015→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 321 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 321 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 29 January 2015 to 4 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 10 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 3 runs (won 0) · to 28 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Chris Honour's strike rate?
- Chris Honour has won 36 of 321 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 11.2% (as at 4 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Chris Honour do best at?
- Newton Abbot by strike rate: 6 wins from 35 runners (17.1%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Chris Honour?
- Bryan Carver, with 212 runners since 2008 — 66% of the total. That pairing has won 28 (13.2%).
- Is Chris Honour in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 6 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Chris Honour's Fair A/E?
- 1.22, from 319 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.