Skip to content
Trainer profile

Frau S Steinberg

183 runners in the lifetime window · 55 individual horses
As at 11 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 89 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
29–183
Wins / Runs
15.8%
Strike rate
n=183
63 (34%)
Placed
1.47
n=181 · 1.22 incl. margin
+141.30
£1 level stake
n=182 at SP · +77.6%
£814k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 10 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 16% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.47).

Deterministic profile computed from 183 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 11 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Rene Piechulek: 13.8% from 58
The read

The record is strongest at Longchamp (FR) (20%, n=30), clear of the yard's 15.8% baseline. It is weakest at Chantilly (FR) (10.9% over 55 runners) — the largest sample in the record, and the widest gap. Rene Piechulek rides 32% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (13.8% vs 15.8%, A/E 1.35) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (24.4%, n=45) and off a 31-60-day break (20%, n=35). The record reads poorly off a 61-180-day break — 8.3% over 36 runners, 7.5pts below the baseline. 6 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Qatar Prix Niel at Longchamp (FR) (Sep 2023, £65,575).

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 15.8% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
14.3%−1.5
n=84 · A/E 1.53 · £1 +135.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
25%+9.2
n=16 · A/E 3.32 · £1 +92.50
Debutants · first career start
15.4%−0.4
n=39 · A/E 1.57 · £1 +1.30
First-time headgear · true-first definition
9.1%−6.7
n=11 · A/E 1.16 · £1 −6.40
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−15.8
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
When favourite
32%
n=25 · A/E 1.26 · £1 +4.10
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
30%+14.2
n=10 · A/E 1.72 · £1 +1.60
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
17.1%+1.3
n=35 · A/E 2.01 · £1 +36.10

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 15.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Good to Soft going 24.4% vs 15.8% · n=45
Off a 61-180-day break 8.3% vs 15.8% · n=36
On Good going 10% vs 15.8% · n=30
At Chantilly (FR) 10.9% vs 15.8% · n=55
Off a 31-60-day break 20% vs 15.8% · n=35
At Longchamp (FR) 20% vs 15.8% · n=30
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 57 9 15.8% +56.50
Good to Soft 45 11 24.4% +75.60
Soft 40 5 12.5% +17.90
Good 30 3 10% −3.20
Heavy 11 1 9.1% −5.50

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chantilly (FR) 55 6 10.9% +100.20
Deauville (FR) 30 5 16.7% −0.20
Longchamp (FR) 30 6 20% +5.50
Saint-Cloud (FR) 27 5 18.5% −5.70
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 18 2 11.1% −2.00
Vichy (FR) 6 2 33.3% +15.90
Compiegne (FR) 4 2 50% +8.60
Strasbourg (FR) 3 0 0% −2.00
Lyon Parilly (FR) 2 0 0% −2.00
Clairefontaine (FR) 2 1 50% +29.00
Nancy (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Marseille Pont-de-Vivaux (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Baden-Baden (GER) 1 0 0% −1.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 1 0 0% −1.00
Hamburg (GER) 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 35 6 17.1% +36.10

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 27 8 29.6% 1.18 +2.10
2nd–3rd fav 42 9 21.4% 1.52 +8.10
4th–6th fav 60 8 13.3% 1.52 +13.10
7th+ in betting 53 4 7.5% 2.23 +118.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Edington (GER)from W Figge 15 2 7 7 Apr 19
Kosakenzipfel (FR) 13 2 6 9 Mar 25
Runnymede (GB)from H-F Devin 11 2 5 12 Oct 24
Angry Bird (IRE) 10 1 1 20 Jun 20
Quest The Moon (GER) 9 3 5 17 Jul 24
Point Blank (GER)from A Morazzoni 8 2 3 12 Jul 18
Wahiba Sands (IRE) 7 1 1 7 Feb 22
Lamarck (GB)from M G Mintchev 7 1 2 16 Oct 19
Royal Fox (GB)from Gerald Geisler 6 1 1 20 Nov 18
Mendocino (GER) 5 0 0 2 Oct 22
Soho (GER) 5 1 3 5 Jun 22
All 55 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 55 horses listed, 16 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from W Figge (3); 39 had their first archived run for this yard.

12 have since run for another yard; 43 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
430101017213101313190
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderRene Piechulek
32% of all rides
13.8% SR · A/E 1.35
RiderRWSR£1
Rene Piechulek 58 8 13.8% +48.70
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2016→
29
Archived wins
6
Pattern / graded wins
£814k
Prize money
2018
Best season · 7 wins
Fantastic Moon (GER) — Qatar Prix Niel (3yo) (Grande Course) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · Sep 2023 · Group 2
£65,575
Quest The Moon (GER) — Prix du Lys (3yo) (Turf) Longchamp (FR) · May 2019 · Group 3
£36,036
Quest The Moon (GER) — Grand Prix de Vichy (3yo+) (Turf) Vichy (FR) · Jul 2024 · Group 3
£34,783

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Dansili (GB) 14.8% · 4–27
Progeny have won 13.7% of 11,842 runs since 2008 (983 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 16.8% from 101. Weakest on Heavy going: 7.9% from 428. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 9.1% from 209.
Reliable Man (GB) 20% · 3–15
Progeny have won 8.5% of 1,218 runs since 2017 (146 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 3.8% from 105. Strongest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 12.7% from 102.
Sea The Moon (GER) 30.8% · 4–13
Progeny have won 12% of 4,590 runs since 2018 (505 horses). Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 15.1% from 815.
Soldier Hollow (GB) 18.2% · 2–11
Progeny have won 11.4% of 1,922 runs since 2011 (268 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 8% from 488. Strongest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 15.1% from 384.
Zebedee (GB) 10% · 1–10
Progeny have won 9% of 7,139 runs since 2014 (435 horses).
Poseidon Adventure (IRE) 22.2% · 2–9
Progeny have won 12.5% of 48 runs since 2015 (6 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 11 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 183 · newest first

The latest 50 of 183 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 15 March 2016 to 14 August 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Frau S Steinberg's strike rate?
Frau S Steinberg has won 29 of 183 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 15.8% (as at 11 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Frau S Steinberg do best at?
Longchamp (FR) by strike rate: 6 wins from 30 runners (20%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Frau S Steinberg?
Rene Piechulek, with 58 runners since 2008 — 32% of the total. That pairing has won 8 (13.8%).
What is Frau S Steinberg's Fair A/E?
1.47, from 181 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 11 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).