As at 29 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Oct 2007
Archive record 2005–2007
No runners from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 10 Jan 2005 to 1 Oct 2007. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Yard Profile
Sent out 143 runners in our archive record (2005–2007), winning with 4% of them — level with the margin-free market read across that record (Fair A/E 1.02).
Deterministic profile computed from 143 archived runs (archive record 2005–2007) · updated 29 Oct 2026
The read
The yard also read well over 1m5f – 2m (9.4%, n=32). The record read poorly in Class 5 — 0% over 42 runners, 3.5pts below the baseline.
Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 3.5% baseline
When favourite
20%
n=5 · A/E 1.17 · £1 +0.50
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
1.4%−2.1
n=71 · A/E 0.50 · £1 −37.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−3.5
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 3.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
Over 1m5f – 2m9.4% vs 3.5% · n=32
In Class 50% vs 3.5% · n=42
With Mark Coumbe0% vs 3.5% · n=32
On Good to Firm going0% vs 3.5% · n=31
In Class 66.4% vs 3.5% · n=47
With claiming riders up1.4% vs 3.5% · n=71
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Flat11032.7%−57.50
Hurdle1915.3%−12.00
NH Flat1417.1%+37.00
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Good to Firm3100%−31.00
Good to Soft2926.9%+29.00
Good2926.9%−10.50
Standard (AW)2514%+9.00
Soft1400%−14.00
Firm1100%−11.00
Heavy400%−4.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Salisbury1500%−15.00
Wolverhampton (AW)1417.1%+20.00
Bath1218.3%+1.00
Chepstow1200%−12.00
Goodwood1100%−11.00
Newbury7114.3%+44.00
Lingfield (AW)600%−6.00
Lingfield600%−6.00
Folkestone6116.7%−0.50
Warwick500%−5.00
Wincanton500%−5.00
Newmarket400%−4.00
Ascot400%−4.00
Exeter400%−4.00
Windsor400%−4.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 64736.4%+22.50
Class 54200%−42.00
Class 42713.7%−20.00
Class 710110%+24.00
Class 3700%−7.00
Class 2600%−6.00
Class 1400%−4.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite5120%1.17+0.50
2nd–3rd fav4125%1.53+3.00
4th–6th fav2400%0.00−24.00
7th+ in betting11032.7%1.39−12.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
1m5f – 2m3239.4%+58.50
6f – 7f2800%−28.00
1m2f – 1m4f2500%−25.00
1m – 1m1f1800%−18.00
2m1f – 2m4f17211.8%+3.00
Under 6f1600%−16.00
2m5f – 3m600%−6.00
Over 3m100%−1.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
20055048%+53.50
20067000%−70.00
20072314.3%−16.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps6634.5%−40.50
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners4212.4%−36.50
14-16 runners3812.6%−31.00
8-10 runners3113.2%+3.00
5-7 runners1700%−17.00
17+ runners15213.3%+49.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 25 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 25 horses listed, 6 have since run for another yard; 19 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. Where a horse came from is not stated on an archive-era record: our archive cannot see before 2005. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
When the yard fires
strike by month, 2005–2007
JFMAMJJASOND
0014004660000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".
Career highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→
5
Archived wins
£24,271
Prize money
2005
Best season · 4 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Lord Lington (FR) — Almapa Father John Wrenn Memorial Conditionals' Handicap Hdl Newton Abbot · Aug 2007 · Class 4
Progeny have won 13.2% of 3,185 runs since 2005 (270 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 9.8% from 358. Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 16.3% from 759. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 5.6% from 161.
Zafonic (USA)0% · 0–17
Progeny have won 10.5% of 2,358 runs since 2005 (167 horses). Weakest on Good to Soft going: 6.2% from 257. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 16% from 181. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 6.8% from 148.
Arazi (USA)0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 5.6% of 72 runs since 2005 (10 horses).
Mark of Esteem (IRE)0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 9.1% of 4,754 runs since 2005 (347 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 12.3% from 203.
Bluegrass Prince (IRE)33.3% · 3–9
Progeny have won 7.4% of 514 runs since 2005 (38 horses). Strongest on Good going: 11.9% from 134.
Royal Applause (GB)0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 8.6% of 15,174 runs since 2005 (931 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5.3% from 398.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 29 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 143 · newest first
The latest 50 of 143 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 10 January 2005 to 1 October 2007.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is N I M Rossiter's strike rate?
N I M Rossiter has won 5 of 143 runners between 2005 and 2007, a strike rate of 3.5% (as at 29 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
What is N I M Rossiter's Fair A/E?
1.02, from 143 runners with a computed fair probability between 2005 and 2007. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
N I M Rossiter·SR 3.5%·A/E 1.02
1Tap Share in the toolbar2Scroll down the sheet3Tap Add to Home Screen, then Add
1Open your browser's menu (the three dots)2Tap Add to Home screen or Install app
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy