Skip to content
Trainer profile

X-L Le Stang

245 runners in the lifetime window · 109 individual horses
As at 12 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Mar 2024
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
9–245
Wins / Runs
3.7%
Strike rate
n=245
24 (10%)
Placed
0.66
n=215 · 0.61 incl. margin
−63.20
£1 level stake
n=220 at SP · −28.7%
£241k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
14.3%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 10 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.66). The edge shows sharpest with horses returning fresh: 5% off breaks of two months or more (97 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 245 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 12 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Fresh horses: 5.2% New recruits: 5.1%
The read

The market has also underrated the yard off a break of 180+ days: Fair A/E 1.61 across 63 runners (6.3% strike, +42.30 to a £1 stake). The record reads poorly on Heavy going — 0% over 31 runners, 3.7pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard in Hurdle races: Fair A/E 0.00 across 63 runners (1.6% strike, −59.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 3.7% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
5.2%+1.5
n=97 · A/E 1.27 · £1 +32.50
New recruits · first run for the yard
5.1%+1.4
n=39 · A/E 1.68 · £1 +55.00
Debutants · first career start
1.5%−2.2
n=67 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −42.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
3.1%−0.6
n=32 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −16.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
14.3%+10.6
n=7 · A/E 3.28 · £1 −1.70
When favourite
0%
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
3.7%+0.0
n=107 · A/E 0.92 · £1 −43.70
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−3.7
n=8 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −8.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 3.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With Richard Le Stang 0% vs 3.7% · n=35
On Heavy going 0% vs 3.7% · n=31
Off a break of 180+ days 6.3% vs 3.7% · n=63
With debutants 1.5% vs 3.7% · n=67
In Hurdle races 1.6% vs 3.7% · n=63
In Chase races 5.5% vs 3.7% · n=55 · A/E 0.56
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 127 5 3.9% +22.50
Hurdle 63 1 1.6% −59.00
Chase 55 3 5.5% −26.70

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Soft 96 4 4.2% −70.70
Standard (AW) 70 2 2.9% −40.00
Heavy 31 0 0% −27.00
Good 25 2 8% +15.50
Good to Soft 20 1 5% +60.00
Good to Firm 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Auteuil (FR) 67 2 3% −64.00
Deauville (FR) 49 1 2% −40.20
Chantilly (FR) 27 1 3.7% −5.80
Saint-Cloud (FR) 15 1 6.7% +4.00
Longchamp (FR) 11 1 9.1% +3.50
Compiegne 9 1 11.1% +5.00
Enghien (FR) 9 0 0% −9.00
Nantes (FR) 7 0 0% −7.00
Angers 6 0 0% −6.00
Morlaix 5 0 0% —
Dieppe (FR) 5 0 0% −5.00
Maisons-Laffitte (FR) 4 0 0% −3.00
Loudeac 3 0 0% −1.00
Fontainebleau (FR) 3 1 33.3% +2.30
Strasbourg (FR) 3 0 0% −3.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 1 8 0 0% −8.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 5 0 0% 0.00 −5.00
2nd–3rd fav 15 1 6.7% 0.00 −1.00
4th–6th fav 38 3 7.9% 1.06 −9.40
7th+ in betting 162 3 1.9% 0.76 −47.80
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Got Frost (FR)from C Escuder · then Mme J Le Stang 17 0 3 3 Feb 24
Top Glory (FR)from G Taupin · then Julian Resimont 10 1 1 6 Dec 23
Sulal Nair (FR) 10 1 2 25 Feb 22
Quick Daddy (FR)from J-Y Artu · then Mme J Le Stang 8 0 1 17 Mar 24
Live The Moment (GB)from D Windrif 8 0 0 28 Aug 12
Ahelia (FR) 6 0 0 1 Mar 20
Osso Bello (FR)from F-M Cottin 6 0 0 19 May 19
Armorigene (FR)from E Lyon · then Mme J Le Stang 5 1 3 5 Jan 24
Oratio Du Clos (FR) 5 0 0 19 Sep 17
Dutch Doctor (FR)from E & G Leenders 4 0 0 20 Oct 21
Brazilia Talisker (FR) 4 0 3 9 Jun 20
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 109 horses sent out in this window — each ran at least 1 time. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 23 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from S Wattel (2); 37 had their first archived run for this yard.

16 have since run for another yard, most often for Mme J Le Stang (7) and Marian Falk Weissmeier (3); 44 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
1364404067070
Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderRichard Le Stang
14% of all rides
0% SR · A/E 0.00
RiderRWSR£1
Richard Le Stang 35 0 0% −32.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
12
Archived wins
£285k
Prize money
2023
Best season · 2 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Etoile De Kerbarh (FR) — Prix Fils du Reine (Chase) Auteuil (FR) · Apr 2009
£23,301
Akadour (FR) — Prix Arthur Veil-Picard (Hurdle) Auteuil (FR) · Mar 2009
£21,437
Jetstream Jack (IRE) — Prix Porania (Chase) (Claimer) (5yo+) (Turf) Fontainebleau (FR) · Nov 2021
£9,857

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Olympic Glory (IRE) 3.7% · 1–27
Progeny have won 8.6% of 2,073 runs since 2018 (264 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 4.7% from 150.
Naaqoos (GB) 9.1% · 1–11
Progeny have won 7.3% of 1,158 runs since 2013 (134 horses).
Policy Maker (IRE) 0% · 0–10
Progeny have won 9% of 1,253 runs since 2010 (145 horses). Weakest on Good to Soft going: 4.5% from 202. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 4.7% from 127.
Pyrus (USA) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 9.1% of 1,446 runs since 2008 (89 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 4.2% from 119. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 5.8% from 208.
Quick Martin (FR) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 0% of 48 runs since 2021 (5 horses).
Beneficial (GB) 14.3% · 1–7
Progeny have won 10.4% of 17,047 runs since 2008 (1,155 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 12 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 257 · newest first

The latest 50 of 257 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 April 2005 to 17 March 2024.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is X-L Le Stang's strike rate?
X-L Le Stang has won 9 of 245 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 3.7% (as at 12 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does X-L Le Stang do best at?
Auteuil (FR) by strike rate: 2 wins from 67 runners (3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is X-L Le Stang's Fair A/E?
0.66, from 215 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 12 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).