D K Weld
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 260 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 11% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.91). In Group and Graded company the record reads 14% (187 runs). The yard is in form now — 4 winners in the last fortnight, above its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Cork (18.3%, n=71) and Galway (15.7%, n=70) — all clear of the yard's 11.4% baseline. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 5.9% (n=101, Fair A/E 0.70). The market has consistently overbet a horse in first-time headgear: 7.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.65 and −40.21 to a £1 stake over 114 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is firing: 4 winners from 21 runners in the last 14 days (19%, 7.6pts above the 11.4% baseline). Chris Hayes rides 75% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (12%, A/E 0.92). The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (16.5%, n=133) and on Good to Firm going (17.9%, n=39). The record reads poorly at trips under 6f — 0% over 37 runners, 11.4pts below the baseline. 250 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Investec Derby at Epsom Downs (Jun 2016, £876,170). The stable star of the record: Famous Name (GB) — 21 wins from 36 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Aug–Sep.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.4% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
In formWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 9,539 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 9,539 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 9 January 2005 to 20 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is D K Weld's strike rate?
- D K Weld has won 149 of 1,312 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 11.4% (as at 21 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does D K Weld do best at?
- Cork by strike rate: 13 wins from 71 runners (18.3%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for D K Weld?
- Chris Hayes, with 982 runners since 2022 — 75% of the total. That pairing has won 118 (12%).
- Is D K Weld in form?
- In the last 14 days: 21 runners, 4 winners, a strike rate of 19%. That is above the baseline of 11.4% since 2022.
- What is D K Weld's Fair A/E?
- 0.91, from 1,309 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.