Skip to content
Trainer profile

Cynthia Woods

143 runners in the last 5 seasons · 19 individual horses
As at 30 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 9 days ago 100% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
2–143
Wins / Runs
1.4%
Strike rate
n=143
8 (6%)
Placed
0.49
n=142 · 0.43 incl. margin
−108.00
£1 level stake
n=143 at SP · −75.5%
£40,078
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 30 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 1% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.49).

Deterministic profile computed from 143 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 30 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fresh horses: 2.8% Tabitha Worsley: 3.6% from 56
The read

Tabitha Worsley rides 39% of the entries and edges the yard's average (3.6% vs 1.4%, A/E 1.16) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well in Chase races (4.9%, n=41). The market has consistently overbet the yard in Class 5: Fair A/E 0.00 across 100 runners (0% strike, −100.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 1.4% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
2.8%+1.4
n=36 · A/E 1.21 · £1 −24.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−1.4
n=12 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −12.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−1.4
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−1.4
n=8 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −8.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−1.4
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00
When favourite
0%
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
1.3%−0.1
n=80 · A/E 0.41 · £1 −57.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 1.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Chase races 4.9% vs 1.4% · n=41
With Tabitha Worsley 3.6% vs 1.4% · n=56
In Class 5 0% vs 1.4% · n=100 · A/E 0.00
In Hurdle races 0% vs 1.4% · n=99 · A/E 0.00
Over 2m1f – 2m4f 0% vs 1.4% · n=63 · A/E 0.00
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 99 0 0% −99.00
Chase 41 2 4.9% −6.00
NH Flat 3 0 0% −3.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 61 1 1.6% −49.00
Good to Soft 49 0 0% −49.00
Soft 27 0 0% −27.00
Heavy 5 1 20% +18.00
Good to Firm 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Plumpton 42 0 0% −42.00
Fontwell 40 0 0% −40.00
Huntingdon 18 0 0% −18.00
Lingfield 8 0 0% −8.00
Wincanton 6 0 0% −6.00
Southwell 5 0 0% −5.00
Worcester 5 1 20% +7.00
Warwick 4 1 25% +19.00
Sandown 2 0 0% −2.00
Newbury 2 0 0% −2.00
Leicester 2 0 0% −2.00
Kempton 2 0 0% −2.00
Stratford 2 0 0% −2.00
Hereford 1 0 0% −1.00
Chepstow 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 5 100 0 0% −100.00
Class 4 34 1 2.9% −22.00
Class 3 8 1 12.5% +15.00
Class 2 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 1 0 0% 0.00 −1.00
2nd–3rd fav 6 1 16.7% 1.56 +6.00
4th–6th fav 35 1 2.9% 0.62 −12.00
7th+ in betting 101 0 0% 0.00 −101.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
62.1% completed · 140 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 41 63.4% 0 1 12 0 2
Hurdle 99 61.6% 1 1 36 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Onnaroll (FR)from Nigel Hawke 23 0 1 11 Apr 25
No Guarantee (GB)then Max Comley 15 0 0 29 Mar 25
Auld Sod (IRE)from Philip Hobbs 14 0 2 20 Nov 23
Bread And Butter (IRE)from Olly Murphy 13 0 2 19 Oct 26
Can't Buy Time (IRE)from Padraig Roche 9 0 0 10 Mar 25
Checkitsme (GB)from Milton Harris 8 0 0 14 May 23
Glorious Lady (IRE)from Keith Dalgleish 8 2 3 30 Jan 23
Major Major (IRE)from Richard Hannon 7 0 0 22 Sep 26
Chief Lady (IRE) 7 0 0 21 Oct 24
Invincible Cave (IRE)from Chris Gordon 7 0 0 1 Oct 22
Design Flaw (GB)from G Ahern 5 0 0 28 Mar 25
All 19 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 19 horses listed, 15 arrived from another yard in our archive; 4 had their first archived run for this yard.

2 have since run for another yard; 17 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
060000000500
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderTabitha Worsley
39% of all rides
3.6% SR · A/E 1.16
RiderRWSR£1
Tabitha Worsley 56 2 3.6% −21.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2010→
5
Archived wins
£57,185
Prize money
2022
Best season · 2 wins
Glorious Lady (IRE) — Get Pulling With PJ Nicholls Ssangyong Conditional Jockeys' Mares' Handicap Chase Worcester · Oct 2022 · Class 4
£7,691
Glorious Lady (IRE) — Find An RSA Syndicate At racehorsesyndicates.org Mares' Handicap Chase Warwick · Feb 2022 · Class 3
£6,808
Little Legend (GB) — Fakenham Ladies Raceday 2nd June Fox Hunters' Chase (For The Turner Family Trophy) Fakenham · May 2013 · Class 6
£1,185

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Kapgarde (FR) 0% · 0–23
Progeny have won 12.5% of 6,621 runs since 2008 (724 horses).
Court Cave (IRE) 0% · 0–21
Progeny have won 10.1% of 7,942 runs since 2008 (551 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 6.8% from 937.
The Gurkha (IRE) 0% · 0–15
Progeny have won 9.7% of 2,028 runs since 2008 (127 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 13.7% from 183. Weakest on Heavy going: 2.9% from 105. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 6.3% from 111.
Westerner (GB) 0% · 0–13
Progeny have won 12.1% of 11,840 runs since 2008 (941 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 8.5% from 188.
Shirocco (GER) 0% · 0–12
Progeny have won 11.2% of 9,174 runs since 2008 (921 horses). Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 7.4% from 203.
Getaway (GER) 0% · 0–9
Progeny have won 11.3% of 10,943 runs since 2008 (1,028 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 23.3% from 133.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 30 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 199 · newest first

The latest 50 of 199 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 13 May 2010 to 21 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
16 Mar 26 Plumpton Bread And Butter (IRE)J: James Best Kalm Club Handicap HurdleClass 5 · 20.5f · Good To Soft · 6 ran 4th 66/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

KTB’s figures

the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026

KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 15 Oct 2026: fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 15 Oct 2026.

Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.

Quick answers

What is Cynthia Woods's strike rate?
Cynthia Woods has won 2 of 143 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 1.4% (as at 30 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Cynthia Woods do best at?
Plumpton by strike rate: 0 wins from 42 runners (0%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Cynthia Woods?
Tabitha Worsley, with 56 runners since 2022 — 39% of the total. That pairing has won 2 (3.6%).
Is Cynthia Woods in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Cynthia Woods's Fair A/E?
0.49, from 142 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 30 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).