Michael J McDonagh
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 50 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 5% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.93).
The record is strongest at Limerick (11.2%, n=143), clear of the yard's 5.3% baseline. It is weakest at Cork (0% over 63 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants struggle at 0% (n=61, Fair A/E 0.00). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 1% strike, Fair A/E 0.27 and −161.00 to a £1 stake over 200 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Cathal Landers rides 14% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (5.4%, A/E 1.12) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well in Chase races (9.2%, n=336) and off a 8-14-day break (9.7%, n=154). One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Campion Insurance Tim Duggan Memorial Handicap Chase at Limerick (Dec 2023, £26,550). The stable star of the record: Black Zero (IRE) — 7 wins from 62 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Feb–Apr.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 5.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,022 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,022 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 13 January 2005 to 1 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Michael J McDonagh's strike rate?
- Michael J McDonagh has won 49 of 921 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 5.3% (as at 3 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Michael J McDonagh do best at?
- Limerick by strike rate: 16 wins from 143 runners (11.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Michael J McDonagh?
- Cathal Landers, with 129 runners since 2008 — 14% of the total. That pairing has won 7 (5.4%).
- Is Michael J McDonagh in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Michael J McDonagh's Fair A/E?
- 0.93, from 917 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.