Skip to content
Jockey profile

George Rooke

1,060 rides in the last 5 seasons · 516 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Sep 2024 100% of rides on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
92–1,060
Wins / Runs
8.7%
Strike rate
n=1,060
266 (25%)
Placed
1.03
n=1,055 · 0.88 incl. margin
−276.02
£1 level stake
n=1,060 at SP · −26.0%
£1.04m
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
10.3%
KTB Rider Profile

Rides around 210 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 9% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.03). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 22% (100 rides).

Deterministic profile computed from 1,060 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fires May–Jun 25.7% when favourite Richard Hughes: 12.7% from 245 LTO winners: 22% Rides the favourite in 7% of races
The read

The record is strongest at Salisbury (20%, n=30) and Wolverhampton (AW) (15.8%, n=133) — all clear of the rider's 8.7% baseline. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 22% (n=100, Fair A/E 1.32), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 0.9% (n=113, Fair A/E 0.23). Richard Hughes supplies 23% of the rides and edges the rider's average (12.7% vs 8.7%, A/E 0.99) — the market has that partnership priced right. The record reads poorly in Class 2 — 1.2% over 84 rides, 7.5pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the rider on Good to Soft going: Fair A/E 0.18 across 69 rides (1.4% strike, −54.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 2 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the rider has landed: the William Hill Conqueror Fillies' Stakes at Goodwood (Apr 2022, £29,489). The standout partner of the record: Largo Bay (USA) — 7 wins from 30 rides together. Seasonally, the rider fires May–Jun.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 8.7% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
6.8%−1.9
n=453 · A/E 1.18 · £1 −174.61
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
22%+13.3
n=100 · A/E 1.32 · £1 +10.72
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
7.1%−1.6
n=156 · A/E 0.94 · £1 −3.72
When favourite
25.7%
n=70 · A/E 0.84 · £1 −20.55
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
8.4%−0.3
n=202 · A/E 0.96 · £1 −48.42
Big fields · 14+ runners
0.9%−7.8
n=113 · A/E 0.23 · £1 −102.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
15.4%+6.7
n=13 · A/E 2.21 · £1 +13.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 8.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On last-time-out winners 22% vs 8.7% · n=100
With C&D winners 17% vs 8.7% · n=141
At Salisbury 20% vs 8.7% · n=30
At Wolverhampton (AW) 15.8% vs 8.7% · n=133
In Class 2 1.2% vs 8.7% · n=84
On Good to Soft going 1.4% vs 8.7% · n=69
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 578 61 10.6% −44.60
Good 173 11 6.4% −90.00
Good to Firm 154 15 9.7% −15.42
Good to Soft 69 1 1.4% −54.00
Soft 57 3 5.3% −46.00
Heavy 18 0 0% −18.00
Firm 11 1 9.1% −8.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Kempton (AW) 166 9 5.4% +2.88
Lingfield (AW) 147 19 12.9% +30.99
Wolverhampton (AW) 133 21 15.8% −19.68
Chelmsford City (AW) 89 10 11.2% −32.54
Bath 76 6 7.9% −14.00
Windsor 47 2 4.3% −41.50
Newbury 41 1 2.4% −37.75
Southwell (AW) 40 2 5% −23.25
Chepstow 39 1 2.6% −31.00
Lingfield 38 4 10.5% −5.50
Goodwood 36 3 8.3% −15.50
Salisbury 30 6 20% +14.50
Brighton 27 2 7.4% −13.17
Ffos Las 22 2 9.1% +11.00
Ascot 19 0 0% −19.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 410 37 9% −79.81
Class 5 360 32 8.9% −71.72
Class 4 142 14 9.9% −32.69
Class 2 84 1 1.2% −82.33
Class 3 51 6 11.8% −22.47
Class 1 13 2 15.4% +13.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 81 20 24.7% 0.85 −25.17
2nd–3rd fav 164 31 18.9% 1.09 −18.85
4th–6th fav 315 32 10.2% 1.31 +16.00
7th+ in betting 500 9 1.8% 0.72 −248.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Largo Bay (USA) 25 6 11 2 Sep 24
Double Time (GB) 14 2 5 14 Aug 24
Nogo's Dream (GB) 14 1 8 29 Jul 24
Heerathetrack (GB) 12 2 8 31 Aug 24
Expert Witness (GB) 11 2 5 15 Jul 24
Rainbow Mirage (GB) 11 4 6 17 Aug 23
Fravanco (GB) 9 1 3 30 Aug 24
Myriad (IRE) 9 0 4 16 Jul 24
Bascule (FR) 8 0 1 6 Jan 24
Native Beach (IRE) 8 1 3 14 Aug 23
Apache Grey (IRE) 8 0 1 6 Oct 22
Meganissi (GB) 7 0 0 16 Jul 24
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 516 horses ridden in this window — each ran at least 4 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
8715611119611528
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
23% of all rides
12.7% SR · A/E 0.99
TrainerRWSR£1
Richard Hughes 245 31 12.7% −45.95
Mark Usher 60 5 8.3% −30.17
Roger Teal 54 6 11.1% +69.50
Michael Madgwick 51 7 13.7% +15.66
Sir Mark Todd 45 7 15.6% +11.16
Hughie Morrison 42 4 9.5% +3.50
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2018→
170
Archived wins
2
Pattern / graded wins
£1.70m
Prize money
2022
Best season · 41 wins
Mrs Fitzherbert (IRE) — William Hill Conqueror Fillies' Stakes (Fillies' And Mares' Listed) Goodwood · Apr 2022 · Listed
£29,489
Kimngrace (IRE) — BetUK Hever Sprint Stakes (Listed) Lingfield (AW) · Feb 2023 · Listed
£25,866
Bascule (FR) — weatherbysshop.co.uk Handicap Chelmsford City (AW) · Dec 2021 · Class 2
£20,616

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Flintshire (GB) 24% · 6–25
Progeny have won 10% of 321 runs since 2008 (40 horses).
Cable Bay (IRE) 12.5% · 3–24
Progeny have won 9.9% of 3,712 runs since 2008 (243 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 13.9% from 641. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 5.5% from 290.
Footstepsinthesand (GB) 8.7% · 2–23
Progeny have won 10.2% of 12,784 runs since 2008 (936 horses). Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 6.9% from 320.
Oasis Dream (GB) 4.5% · 1–22
Progeny have won 11.8% of 18,002 runs since 2008 (1,509 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 17.3% from 150. Weakest on Heavy going: 8.5% from 482. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 7.1% from 790.
Adaay (IRE) 5.3% · 1–19
Progeny have won 9.1% of 2,957 runs since 2008 (192 horses). Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 6% from 497.
Dandy Man (IRE) 5.3% · 1–19
Progeny have won 9.1% of 14,927 runs since 2008 (930 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 5.3% from 170.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 2,038 · newest first

The latest 50 of 2,038 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 9 June 2018 to 28 September 2024.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
25 Sep 24 Kempton (AW) Capstan (GB)T: Lydia Richards Racing TV HandicapClass 6 · 16f · Standard To Slow · 8 ran 5th 11/1
17 Sep 24 Brighton Amathus (IRE)T: Patrick Chamings Autismawareness HandicapClass 6 · 7f · Good · 11 ran 7th 9/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is George Rooke's strike rate?
George Rooke has won 92 of 1,060 rides since 2022, a strike rate of 8.7% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does George Rooke do best at?
Salisbury by strike rate: 6 wins from 30 rides (20%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Which yard does George Rooke ride most for?
Richard Hughes, with 245 rides since 2022 — 23% of the total. That pairing has won 31 (12.7%).
What is George Rooke's Fair A/E?
1.03, from 1,055 rides with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).