Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Yard Profile
Sends out around 20 runners a season, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.96).
Deterministic profile computed from 100 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 20 Oct 2026
The read
The yard also reads well in Chase races (9.3%, n=43). The record reads poorly in Hurdle races — 0% over 38 runners, 4pts below the baseline.
Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 4% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−4.0
n=27 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −27.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−4.0
n=19 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −19.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−4.0
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−4.0
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−4.0
n=3 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −3.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−4.0
n=11 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −11.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−4.0
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
In Chase races9.3% vs 4% · n=43
With a new jockey booking0% vs 4% · n=45
In Hurdle races0% vs 4% · n=38
With Brendan Powell7.3% vs 4% · n=41
On Good going6.5% vs 4% · n=62
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Chase4349.3%+11.33
Hurdle3800%−38.00
Flat1600%−16.00
NH Flat300%−3.00
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Good6246.5%−7.67
Good to Soft1200%−12.00
Good to Firm800%−8.00
Standard (AW)800%−8.00
Soft700%−7.00
Heavy200%−2.00
Firm100%−1.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Uttoxeter16212.5%+22.00
Southwell1119.1%+1.00
Fontwell800%−8.00
Worcester800%−8.00
Bangor-on-Dee700%−7.00
Market Rasen600%−6.00
Stratford500%−5.00
Warwick4125%+0.33
Doncaster400%−4.00
Kempton (AW)400%−4.00
Wolverhampton (AW)300%−3.00
Newton Abbot300%−3.00
Huntingdon300%−3.00
Bath200%−2.00
Ludlow200%−2.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 57445.4%−19.67
Class 41400%−14.00
Class 6800%−8.00
Class 1200%−2.00
Class 3200%−2.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav9111.1%0.63−4.67
4th–6th fav2613.8%0.74−14.00
7th+ in betting6523.1%1.66−27.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
2m5f – 3m3812.6%−26.00
2m1f – 2m4f1800%−18.00
Over 3m17317.6%+25.33
1m5f – 2m1500%−15.00
1m2f – 1m4f700%−7.00
1m – 1m1f400%−4.00
6f – 7f100%−1.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
20221000%−10.00
20231915.3%−7.00
20242114.8%−4.00
20252827.1%−2.67
20262200%−22.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps8045%−25.67
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
8-10 runners4212.4%−21.00
11-13 runners2428.3%+5.00
5-7 runners2200%−22.00
14-16 runners500%−5.00
2-4 runners5120%−0.67
17+ runners200%−2.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.
All 21 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 21 horses listed, 19 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Paul John Gilligan (6) and Martin Smith (3); 2 had their first archived run for this yard.
3 have since run for another yard, most often for Shaun Lycett (3); 18 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
Current form
significance-gated
Last 14 days
Small sample
0 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.
When the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
0000801800000
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Progeny have won 12.5% of 6,203 runs since 2008 (504 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 20 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 338 · newest first
The latest 50 of 338 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 20 July 2015 to 13 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Clare Ellam's strike rate?
Clare Ellam has won 4 of 100 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 4% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Is Clare Ellam in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Clare Ellam's Fair A/E?
0.96, from 100 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Clare Ellam·SR 4%·A/E 0.96
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy