Clive Boultbee-Brooks
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 20 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 10% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.96).
The record is strongest at Ffos Las (19.4%, n=36), clear of the yard's 10.4% baseline. Horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 7.1% (n=70, Fair A/E 0.85). Richard Patrick rides 57% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (7.9% vs 10.4%, A/E 0.79). The yard also reads well over 2m5f – 3m (19.3%, n=88) and in Chase races (18.6%, n=70). The record reads poorly over 1m5f – 2m — 3.8% over 104 runners, 6.6pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard on Good to Soft going: Fair A/E 0.53 across 103 runners (4.9% strike, −75.75 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. Seasonally, the yard fires Feb–Apr.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 10.4% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 10.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2021→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 309 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 309 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 4 March 2021 to 2 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 22 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 2 runs (won 0) · to 22 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Clive Boultbee-Brooks's strike rate?
- Clive Boultbee-Brooks has won 32 of 309 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 10.4% (as at 3 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Clive Boultbee-Brooks do best at?
- Ffos Las by strike rate: 7 wins from 36 runners (19.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Clive Boultbee-Brooks?
- Richard Patrick, with 177 runners since 2008 — 57% of the total. That pairing has won 14 (7.9%).
- Is Clive Boultbee-Brooks in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 3 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Clive Boultbee-Brooks's Fair A/E?
- 0.96, from 307 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.