Warren Greatrex
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 240 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 13% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.94). Horses with headgear back on after a bare run strike at 19% (32 runs).
The record is strongest at Taunton (23.3%, n=30), clear of the yard's 12.6% baseline. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a positive signal at 18.8% (n=32, Fair A/E 1.61), but new recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 6.7% (n=30, Fair A/E 0.65). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 8% strike, Fair A/E 0.68 and −13.23 to a £1 stake over 238 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. James Bowen rides 32% of the entries and edges the yard's average (17% vs 12.6%, A/E 1.04) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well in Chase races (21.1%, n=360). The record reads poorly off a break of 180+ days — 4.9% over 103 runners, 7.7pts below the baseline. 21 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Ladbrokes World Hurdle at Cheltenham (Mar 2015, £170,850). The stable star of the record: La Bague Au Roi (FR) — 14 wins from 28 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Nov–Dec.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 12.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 12.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2009→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 4,026 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 4,026 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 8 October 2009 to 13 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Warren Greatrex's strike rate?
- Warren Greatrex has won 153 of 1,217 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 12.6% (as at 19 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Warren Greatrex do best at?
- Taunton by strike rate: 7 wins from 30 runners (23.3%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Warren Greatrex?
- James Bowen, with 394 runners since 2022 — 32% of the total. That pairing has won 67 (17%).
- Is Warren Greatrex in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 7 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Warren Greatrex's Fair A/E?
- 0.94, from 1,214 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.