Skip to content
Trainer profile

Clive Boultbee-Brooks

304 runners in the last 5 seasons · 53 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 11 days ago 100% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
30–304
Wins / Runs
9.9%
Strike rate
n=304
95 (31%)
Placed
0.92
n=302 · 0.79 incl. margin
−118.37
£1 level stake
n=304 at SP · −38.9%
£337k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
11.1%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 60 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 10% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.92).

Deterministic profile computed from 304 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fires Feb–Apr Richard Patrick: 7.9% from 177 Claiming riders: 10.7%
The read

The record is strongest at Ffos Las (20.6%, n=34), clear of the yard's 9.9% baseline. Horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 6.1% (n=66, Fair A/E 0.75). Richard Patrick rides 58% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (7.9% vs 9.9%, A/E 0.79). The yard also reads well over 2m5f – 3m (18.6%, n=86) and on Heavy going (18.2%, n=33). The record reads poorly on Good to Soft going — 3.9% over 102 runners, 6pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 1m5f – 2m: Fair A/E 0.48 across 102 runners (3.9% strike, −63.75 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. Seasonally, the yard fires Feb–Apr.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 9.9% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
6.1%−3.8
n=66 · A/E 0.75 · £1 −44.25
New recruits · first run for the yard
6.7%−3.2
n=15 · A/E 0.81 · £1 −7.00
Debutants · first career start
8.1%−1.8
n=37 · A/E 0.99 · £1 −1.50
First-time headgear · true-first definition
4.5%−5.4
n=22 · A/E 0.44 · £1 −17.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−9.9
n=8 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −8.00
When favourite
29.6%
n=27 · A/E 0.91 · £1 −5.37
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
10.7%+0.8
n=75 · A/E 1.14 · £1 −17.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−9.9
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 2m5f – 3m 18.6% vs 9.9% · n=86
At Ffos Las 20.6% vs 9.9% · n=34
On Heavy going 18.2% vs 9.9% · n=33
In Chase races 16.7% vs 9.9% · n=66
On Good to Soft going 3.9% vs 9.9% · n=102
Over 1m5f – 2m 3.9% vs 9.9% · n=102
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 222 18 8.1% −110.37
Chase 66 11 16.7% −11.00
NH Flat 16 1 6.3% +3.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good to Soft 102 4 3.9% −78.50
Soft 88 14 15.9% +4.13
Good 75 5 6.7% −40.25
Heavy 33 6 18.2% −2.75
Good to Firm 6 1 16.7% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Ffos Las 34 7 20.6% +2.25
Chepstow 27 2 7.4% −16.75
Hereford 26 5 19.2% +1.88
Uttoxeter 18 1 5.6% −13.00
Warwick 16 1 6.3% −11.00
Ludlow 14 3 21.4% +19.00
Lingfield 13 1 7.7% −7.50
Exeter 12 0 0% −12.00
Stratford 12 2 16.7% +1.00
Bangor-on-Dee 10 1 10% +9.00
Worcester 10 0 0% −10.00
Taunton 9 0 0% −9.00
Wetherby 8 1 12.5% −2.50
Huntingdon 8 1 12.5% −3.00
Wincanton 7 0 0% −7.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 4 149 16 10.7% −67.87
Class 5 94 9 9.6% −31.33
Class 3 41 4 9.8% −3.67
Class 2 10 1 10% −5.50
Class 1 7 0 0% −7.00
Class 6 2 0 0% −2.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 29 8 27.6% 0.87 −7.37
2nd–3rd fav 73 12 16.4% 1.01 −9.00
4th–6th fav 119 9 7.6% 0.96 −38.00
7th+ in betting 83 1 1.2% 0.49 −64.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
85.1% completed · 288 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 66 74.2% 1 1 15 0 0
Hurdle 222 88.3% 0 4 21 1 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Bertie B (GB) 19 3 7 4 Oct 26
Della Casa Lunga (IRE)from S Curling 18 3 6 23 Apr 26
Express Surprise (IRE) 17 4 9 24 Apr 26
El Granjero (IRE) 17 3 11 24 Apr 26
El Gavilan (FR) 14 3 7 12 Apr 26
Felicie Du Maquis (FR) 12 4 6 29 Jan 26
Kantagua Du Large (FR)from P & C Peltier 11 0 0 16 Jul 26
Dublin To Milan (IRE) 11 0 1 5 May 26
Welcheston Warrier (GB) 11 0 3 14 Apr 26
Orange Diamond (FR)from M Mescam · then T Ellis 10 0 1 13 May 25
Half Pint Daisy (IRE) 9 0 1 25 May 26
Sweet Honey B (IRE) 8 0 2 11 Oct 26
All 53 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 53 horses listed, 16 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Olly Murphy (2) and Tom Lacey (2); 37 had their first archived run for this yard.

6 have since run for another yard; 47 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
81716120005000310
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderRichard Patrick
58% of all rides
7.9% SR · A/E 0.79
RiderRWSR£1
Richard Patrick 177 14 7.9% −81.56
Mr Tommie M O'Brien 51 7 13.7% −1.58
Ned Fox 37 2 5.4% −26.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2021→
32
Archived wins
£344k
Prize money
2026
Best season · 10 wins
Della Casa Lunga (IRE) — Ladbrokes Play '1-2-Free' On Football Mares' Handicap Hurdle (GBB Race) Kempton · Dec 2024 · Class 2
£15,609
El Granjero (IRE) — QuinnBet Highland National Handicap Chase (GBB Race) Perth · Apr 2026 · Class 3
£15,609
Felicie Du Maquis (FR) — Good Life Plus Cash Free Prizes Mares' Handicap Hurdle Ludlow · Feb 2025 · Class 3
£6,337

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Kayf Tara (GB) 15.8% · 3–19
Progeny have won 12.6% of 13,740 runs since 2008 (1,148 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 16.2% from 1,708.
Champs Elysees (GB) 16.7% · 3–18
Progeny have won 11.5% of 7,119 runs since 2008 (521 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 7.9% from 391. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 7.5% from 387.
Getaway (GER) 11.8% · 2–17
Progeny have won 11.3% of 10,918 runs since 2008 (1,028 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 23.7% from 131.
Mahler (GB) 23.5% · 4–17
Progeny have won 10.8% of 8,837 runs since 2008 (784 horses). Strongest on Good to Firm going: 15.1% from 119.
Youmzain (IRE) 17.6% · 3–17
Progeny have won 8.6% of 1,738 runs since 2008 (211 horses).
Diamond Boy (FR) 0% · 0–16
Progeny have won 12% of 2,271 runs since 2008 (284 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 306 · newest first

The latest 50 of 306 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 4 March 2021 to 11 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
13 Jul 26 Newton Abbot Bowling Shane (IRE)J: Ned Fox Racing Club Handicap HurdleClass 5 · 18.5f · Good To Firm · 12 ran 4th 22/1
04 Jun 26 Uttoxeter Bowling Shane (IRE)J: Ned Fox Litholexal Handicap HurdleClass 5 · 20f · Good · 7 ran 5th 11/2

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Clive Boultbee-Brooks's strike rate?
Clive Boultbee-Brooks has won 30 of 304 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 9.9% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Clive Boultbee-Brooks do best at?
Ffos Las by strike rate: 7 wins from 34 runners (20.6%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Clive Boultbee-Brooks?
Richard Patrick, with 177 runners since 2022 — 58% of the total. That pairing has won 14 (7.9%).
Is Clive Boultbee-Brooks in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Clive Boultbee-Brooks's Fair A/E?
0.92, from 302 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).