John Patrick Ryan
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 190 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 7% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.94). The yard is quiet just now — 0 winners in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Gowran Park (13%, n=77), clear of the yard's 6.7% baseline. It is weakest at Naas (0% over 67 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants struggle at 2.6% (n=192, Fair A/E 0.71). The market has consistently overbet in Group and Graded company the record: 2.8% strike, Fair A/E 0.56 and −248.25 to a £1 stake over 389 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 0 from 16 runners in the last 14 days (0%, 6.7pts below the 6.7% baseline). Danny Mullins rides 15% of the entries and edges the yard's average (9.9% vs 6.7%, A/E 1.13) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (10.9%, n=441). 11 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Guinness Handicap Chase at Punchestown (Apr 2012, £49,600). The stable star of the record: Kylecrue (IRE) — 12 wins from 81 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires May–Jul.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,672 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,672 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 6 January 2005 to 25 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is John Patrick Ryan's strike rate?
- John Patrick Ryan has won 244 of 3,646 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 6.7% (as at 25 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does John Patrick Ryan do best at?
- Sligo by strike rate: 31 wins from 283 runners (11%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for John Patrick Ryan?
- Danny Mullins, with 534 runners since 2008 — 15% of the total. That pairing has won 53 (9.9%).
- Is John Patrick Ryan in form?
- In the last 14 days: 16 runners, 0 winners, a strike rate of 0%. That is below the baseline of 6.7% since 2008.
- What is John Patrick Ryan's Fair A/E?
- 0.94, from 3,643 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.