M Rolland
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 140 runners a season, winning with 12% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.96). In Group and Graded company the record reads 15% (655 runs).
In Group and Graded company the record reads well at 15% (n=655, Fair A/E 1.23), but new recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 7% (n=128, Fair A/E 0.39). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 9.6% strike, Fair A/E 0.80 and −293.20 to a £1 stake over 847 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Ludovic Philipperon rides 22% of the entries and edges the yard's average (14.7% vs 11.6%, A/E 1.16) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well over 1m5f – 2m (18.9%, n=106). The record reads poorly over 1m – 1m1f — 3.3% over 92 runners, 8.3pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 6f – 7f: Fair A/E 0.68 across 76 runners (5.3% strike, −36.70 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 112 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Grande Course de Haies d'Auteuil at Auteuil (FR) (Jun 2009, £161,650). The stable star of the record: Questarabad (FR) — 15 wins from 24 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Nov–Dec.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,924 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,924 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 10 March 2005 to 24 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is M Rolland's strike rate?
- M Rolland has won 303 of 2,611 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 11.6% (as at 27 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does M Rolland do best at?
- Auteuil (FR) by strike rate: 218 wins from 1,742 runners (12.5%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for M Rolland?
- Ludovic Philipperon, with 563 runners since 2008 — 22% of the total. That pairing has won 83 (14.7%).
- Is M Rolland in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 9 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is M Rolland's Fair A/E?
- 0.96, from 2,336 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.