Sheila Lewis
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 40 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 7% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.00).
The record is strongest at Warwick (17.8%, n=45) and Uttoxeter (14%, n=43) — all clear of the yard's 7% baseline. New recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 0% (n=53, Fair A/E 0.00). Sean Houlihan rides 39% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (5.9%, A/E 0.94). The yard also reads well on Good to Firm going (15.6%, n=45) and in Class 3 (14.5%, n=55). The stable star of the record: Volcano (FR) — 6 wins from 35 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires May–Jun.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2012→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 775 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 775 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 29 March 2012 to 5 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 17 Oct 2026: top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 26 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Sheila Lewis's strike rate?
- Sheila Lewis has won 54 of 775 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 7% (as at 10 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Sheila Lewis do best at?
- Warwick by strike rate: 8 wins from 45 runners (17.8%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Sheila Lewis?
- Sean Houlihan, with 306 runners since 2008 — 39% of the total. That pairing has won 18 (5.9%).
- Is Sheila Lewis in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 4 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Sheila Lewis's Fair A/E?
- 1.00, from 774 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.