Skip to content
Jockey profile

Frederick Larson

1,060 rides in the lifetime window · 465 individual horses
As at 9 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last ride Oct 2025 100% of rides on the flat
from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it
105–1,060
Wins / Runs
9.9%
Strike rate
n=1,060
300 (28%)
Placed
0.95
n=1,055 · 0.82 incl. margin
−371.90
£1 level stake
n=1,060 at SP · −35.1%
£1.38m
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
7.4%
KTB Rider Profile

Rides around 60 times a season, almost all on the flat, winning on 10% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.95). Riding last-time-out winners the record reads 14% (114 rides). Rides mostly for Michael Appleby — 58% of rides in the window.

Deterministic profile computed from 1,060 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 9 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Fires Jun–Jul 27.2% when favourite Michael Appleby: 11.2% from 615 First rides: 11.2% LTO winners: 14% Claiming: 10.2% Rides the favourite in 10% of races
The read

The record is strongest at Nottingham (16.7%, n=48), clear of the rider's 9.9% baseline. It is weakest at Newcastle (AW) (3% over 66 rides) — the widest gap in the record. Rides on last-time-out winners have been a positive signal at 14% (n=114, Fair A/E 0.74), but rides in big fields of 14 or more have been a poor signal at 5.5% (n=110, Fair A/E 0.92). Michael Appleby supplies 58% of the rides and matches the rider's average almost exactly (11.2%, A/E 0.93). The rider also reads well on Good to Firm going (14.6%, n=151). The record reads poorly over 1m5f – 2m — 3.4% over 58 rides, 6.5pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the rider in Class 4: Fair A/E 0.55 across 181 rides (5.5% strike, −110.83 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. The standout partner of the record: Mostallim (GB) — 5 wins from 20 rides together. Seasonally, the rider fires Jun–Jul.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Riding patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 9.9% baseline
First ride on the horse · first captured pairing
11.2%+1.3
n=465 · A/E 1.24 · £1 −71.19
Last-time-out winners · previous run was a win
14%+4.1
n=114 · A/E 0.74 · £1 −59.59
Fresh horses · 61+ days off
7.4%−2.5
n=135 · A/E 1.24 · £1 −22.00
When favourite
27.2%
n=103 · A/E 0.90 · £1 −29.17
Claiming rides · riding with a claim
10.2%+0.3
n=856 · A/E 0.96 · £1 −304.56
Big fields · 14+ runners
5.5%−4.4
n=110 · A/E 0.92 · £1 −53.25
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−9.9
n=6 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −6.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. First rides are the first captured pairing of horse and rider; last-time-out winners are horses whose previous captured run was a win; claiming rides are runs where the rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With new recruits 18.2% vs 9.9% · n=44
At Newcastle (AW) 3% vs 9.9% · n=66
Over 1m5f – 2m 3.4% vs 9.9% · n=58
At Nottingham 16.7% vs 9.9% · n=48
On Good to Firm going 14.6% vs 9.9% · n=151
In Class 4 5.5% vs 9.9% · n=181
This filter uses derived form angles computed for 80.2% of the archive so far (as at 9 Nov 2026); the sample will grow as sequencing completes.
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 631 55 8.7% −307.54
Good to Firm 151 22 14.6% −2.31
Good 117 9 7.7% −56.17
Soft 79 9 11.4% −8.50
Good to Soft 63 8 12.7% +0.62
Heavy 18 2 11.1% +3.00
Firm 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Southwell (AW) 149 10 6.7% −89.03
Wolverhampton (AW) 135 17 12.6% −20.42
Chelmsford City (AW) 115 11 9.6% −46.74
Kempton (AW) 92 7 7.6% −62.00
Lingfield (AW) 74 8 10.8% −36.60
Newcastle (AW) 66 2 3% −52.75
Yarmouth 49 6 12.2% −13.19
Nottingham 48 8 16.7% +25.50
Leicester 40 6 15% +15.25
Doncaster 34 2 5.9% −19.00
Catterick 19 6 31.6% +18.75
Windsor 19 1 5.3% −13.50
Brighton 18 4 22.2% +0.83
Ascot 17 0 0% −17.00
Chepstow 17 1 5.9% −10.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 410 40 9.8% −146.94
Class 5 327 40 12.2% −84.63
Class 4 181 10 5.5% −110.83
Class 3 72 9 12.5% −23.50
Class 2 64 6 9.4% +0.00
Class 1 6 0 0% −6.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 123 30 24.4% 0.85 −38.17
2nd–3rd fav 208 33 15.9% 0.93 −50.23
4th–6th fav 328 36 11% 1.34 +2.50
7th+ in betting 401 6 1.5% 0.48 −286.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses ridden

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Mostallim (GB) 20 5 12 14 Sep 23
Billyjoh (GB) 17 3 10 12 Jul 25
Mehmo (IRE) 17 3 6 13 Nov 24
Crimson King (IRE) 17 2 5 3 Jun 23
Thrave (GB) 16 2 4 3 Jul 23
Plastic Paddy (GB) 13 2 6 6 Apr 23
Starsong (IRE) 11 1 5 21 Aug 25
Baldomero (IRE) 11 1 6 12 May 25
Tyke (IRE) 11 2 3 17 Feb 25
George Morland (GB) 10 2 3 27 Aug 23
Juan Les Pins (GB) 8 1 1 6 Sep 25
Gypsy Nation (IRE) 8 0 0 15 Aug 25
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 465 horses ridden in this window — each ran at least 4 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.

By month

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
8108910171310117312
A flat rider: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Riding for

same window · biggest samples first
58% of all rides
11.2% SR · A/E 0.93
TrainerRWSR£1
Michael Appleby 615 69 11.2% −186.96
Amy Murphy 117 10 8.5% −25.77
Roger Teal 33 5 15.2% −4.50
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2020→
105
Archived wins
£1.38m
Prize money
2022
Best season · 36 wins
Pride Of America (FR) — John Smith's Cup Handicap (Heritage Handicap) York · Jul 2023 · Class 2
£103,080
Miss Cantik (FR) — Madri Excepcional King Richard III Cup Handicap Leicester · Apr 2024 · Class 2
£25,770
Painters Palette (IRE) — William Hill Extra Place Races Daily Racing League Race 33 Handicap Wolverhampton (AW) · Sep 2023 · Class 3
£25,770

Sires of the horses ridden

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Bated Breath (GB) 17.5% · 7–40
Progeny have won 10.8% of 8,177 runs since 2016 (670 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 7.6% from 855.
Mayson (GB) 17.5% · 7–40
Progeny have won 10.7% of 7,394 runs since 2016 (442 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 13.7% from 1,731. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 2.8% from 106.
Equiano (FR) 12.9% · 4–31
Progeny have won 9.1% of 7,543 runs since 2014 (549 horses).
Mehmas (IRE) 10.3% · 3–29
Progeny have won 11.5% of 8,233 runs since 2020 (754 horses).
Kingman (GB) 8% · 2–25
Progeny have won 14.6% of 7,532 runs since 2018 (779 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 11% from 970. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 9% from 122.
Starspangledbanner (AUS) 4.3% · 1–23
Progeny have won 11.1% of 7,226 runs since 2014 (664 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 14.6% from 1,199.
Top line: the rider's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 9 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 1,060 · newest first

The latest 50 of 1,060 archived rides, newest first. The full record runs from 8 December 2020 to 23 October 2025.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
06 Sep 25 Thirsk Juan Les Pins (GB)T: Michael Appleby Rudding Park HandicapClass 3 · 6f · Good · 16 ran 9th 14/1
15 Aug 25 Yarmouth Star Of St Louis (FR)T: Wayne Lukas QuinnBet Classified StakesClass 6 · 8f · Good To Firm · 12 ran 5th 33/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Frederick Larson's strike rate?
Frederick Larson has won 105 of 1,060 rides since 2008, a strike rate of 9.9% (as at 9 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Frederick Larson do best at?
Nottingham by strike rate: 8 wins from 48 rides (16.7%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most rides on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Which yard does Frederick Larson ride most for?
Michael Appleby, with 615 rides since 2008 — 58% of the total. That pairing has won 69 (11.2%).
What is Frederick Larson's Fair A/E?
0.95, from 1,055 rides with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 9 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).