Dylan Cunha
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 250 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 12% of them — level with the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.00). New recruits from other yards win at 19% first time out (48 runs). The yard is in form now — 5 winners in the last fortnight, above its own baseline.
It is weakest at Newmarket (0% over 42 runners) — the widest gap in the record. New recruits from other stables on their first run win at 18.8% (n=48, Fair A/E 1.75), but in Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 2.9% (n=35, Fair A/E 0.46). The market has consistently overbet runners with a claiming rider up: 8.3% strike, Fair A/E 0.79 and −72.00 to a £1 stake over 157 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is firing: 5 winners from 19 runners in the last 14 days (26.3%, 14.6pts above the 11.7% baseline). Rhys Clutterbuck rides 15% of the entries and edges the yard's average (14.4% vs 11.7%, A/E 1.16) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The record reads poorly off a break of 180+ days — 0% over 30 runners, 11.7pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Al Basti Equiworld, Dubai Joel Stakes at Newmarket (Sep 2024, £70,888). The stable star of the record: Asgard's Captain (IRE) — 9 wins from 33 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Mar–May.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
In formWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2022→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,264 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,264 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 28 April 2022 to 19 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Dylan Cunha's strike rate?
- Dylan Cunha has won 148 of 1,264 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 11.7% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Dylan Cunha do best at?
- Leicester by strike rate: 6 wins from 33 runners (18.2%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Dylan Cunha?
- Rhys Clutterbuck, with 187 runners since 2022 — 15% of the total. That pairing has won 27 (14.4%).
- Is Dylan Cunha in form?
- In the last 14 days: 19 runners, 5 winners, a strike rate of 26.3%. That is above the baseline of 11.7% since 2022.
- What is Dylan Cunha's Fair A/E?
- 1.00, from 1,256 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.