Charles Egerton
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sent out around 80 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 9% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.83). With a claiming rider up the record reads 15% (39 runs).
Runners with a claiming rider up have been a positive signal at 15.4% (n=39, Fair A/E 1.35). Jimmy McCarthy rode 22% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (11.2%, A/E 1.20) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also read well on Soft going (16.9%, n=77) and in NH Flat races (17.2%, n=64). The market has also underrated the yard over 1m5f – 2m: Fair A/E 1.22 across 181 runners (14.9% strike, +13.23 to a £1 stake). The record read poorly over 6f – 7f — 0% over 31 runners, 9.3pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard in Flat races: Fair A/E 0.53 across 174 runners (4% strike, −53.50 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperformed what the price implied. 3 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Juvenile Novices' Handicap Hurdle at Cheltenham (Mar 2006, £42,765). The stable star of the record was Dr Livingstone (IRE) — 7 wins from 44 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fired Oct–Dec.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 9.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,022 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,022 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 1 March 2014.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Charles Egerton's strike rate?
- Charles Egerton has won 49 of 527 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 9.3% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Charles Egerton do best at?
- Newbury by strike rate: 2 wins from 45 runners (4.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Charles Egerton?
- Jimmy McCarthy, with 116 runners since 2008 — 22% of the total. That pairing has won 13 (11.2%).
- What is Charles Egerton's Fair A/E?
- 0.83, from 525 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.