As at 15 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Sep 200798% of runners on the flat
Archive record 2005–2007
No runners from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 19 Apr 2005 to 23 Sep 2007. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
3–122
Wins / Runs
2.5%
Strike rate
n=122
16 (13%)
Placed
0.58
Fair A/E
n=122 · 0.48 incl. margin
−96.00
£1 level stake
n=122 at SP · −78.7%
£28,381
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Yard Profile
Sent out 122 runners in our archive record (2005–2007), almost all on the flat, winning with 3% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across that record (Fair A/E 0.58).
Deterministic profile computed from 122 archived runs (archive record 2005–2007) · updated 15 Oct 2026
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 2.5% baseline
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
0%−2.5
n=13 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −13.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
Over 6f – 7f0% vs 2.5% · n=46
On Standard (AW) going1.4% vs 2.5% · n=71 · A/E 0.34
In Class 51.6% vs 2.5% · n=64 · A/E 0.40
At Lingfield (AW)1.8% vs 2.5% · n=55 · A/E 0.44
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Flat11932.5%−93.00
Hurdle300%−3.00
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW)7111.4%−58.00
Good to Firm2100%−21.00
Good1119.1%−3.00
Soft8112.5%−3.00
Good to Soft700%−7.00
Firm400%−4.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Lingfield (AW)5511.8%−42.00
Kempton (AW)1500%−15.00
Lingfield1317.7%−5.00
Folkestone10110%−5.00
Sandown500%−5.00
Brighton500%−5.00
Windsor500%−5.00
Salisbury400%−4.00
Plumpton300%−3.00
Goodwood300%−3.00
Newbury300%−3.00
Southwell (AW)100%−1.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 56411.6%−59.00
Class 64412.3%−31.00
Class 41218.3%−4.00
Class 3200%−2.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav11218.2%1.47+2.00
4th–6th fav2314.3%0.69−10.00
7th+ in betting8800%0.00−88.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
6f – 7f4600%−46.00
1m – 1m1f4312.3%−30.00
1m2f – 1m4f1700%−17.00
Under 6f12216.7%+1.00
1m5f – 2m400%−4.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
20054025%−27.00
20065411.9%−41.00
20072800%−28.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps6323.2%−42.00
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners5811.7%−45.00
8-10 runners2700%−27.00
14-16 runners2414.2%−16.00
5-7 runners9111.1%−4.00
17+ runners300%−3.00
2-4 runners100%−1.00
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 15 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 15 horses listed, 5 have since run for another yard; 10 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. Where a horse came from is not stated on an archive-era record: our archive cannot see before 2005. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
When the yard fires
strike by month, 2005–2007
JFMAMJJASOND
0002970000000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Progeny have won 9% of 7,502 runs since 2005 (483 horses). Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 5.9% from 1,219.
Titus Livius (FR)4.5% · 1–22
Progeny have won 7.9% of 3,715 runs since 2005 (218 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 12.3% from 122.
Imperial Ballet (IRE)0% · 0–18
Progeny have won 6.8% of 2,886 runs since 2005 (200 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 9.9% from 394.
Foxhound (USA)0% · 0–9
Progeny have won 6.6% of 3,032 runs since 2005 (167 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 10.4% from 115. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 9.9% from 781.
Bishop of Cashel (GB)0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 7.9% of 1,085 runs since 2005 (105 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 13.2% from 114. Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 11.6% from 147. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 4.5% from 287.
Boundary (USA)0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 10.7% of 234 runs since 2005 (11 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 122 · newest first
The latest 50 of 122 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 19 April 2005 to 23 September 2007.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is R M Flower's strike rate?
R M Flower has won 3 of 122 runners between 2005 and 2007, a strike rate of 2.5% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
Which course does R M Flower do best at?
Lingfield (AW) by strike rate: 1 wins from 55 runners (1.8%) between 2005 and 2007. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is R M Flower's Fair A/E?
0.58, from 122 runners with a computed fair probability between 2005 and 2007. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
R M Flower·SR 2.5%·A/E 0.58
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy