Tom McGuinness
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 10 runners a season, winning with 6% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.61). With a claiming rider up the record reads 9% (87 runs).
It is weakest at Gowran Park (0% over 32 runners) — the largest sample in the record, and the widest gap. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a positive signal at 9.2% (n=87, Fair A/E 1.86), but horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 0% (n=33, Fair A/E 0.00). Killian Leonard rides 27% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (1.9% vs 5.6%, A/E 0.83). The yard also reads well off a 15-30-day break (10.9%, n=55) and on Standard (AW) going (8.8%, n=34). The record reads poorly over 1m – 1m1f — 1.8% over 57 runners, 3.8pts below the baseline. Seasonally, the yard fires Jul–Aug.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 5.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2021→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 198 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 198 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 July 2021 to 4 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 25 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 1 run (won 0, 1 did not run) · to 25 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Tom McGuinness's strike rate?
- Tom McGuinness has won 11 of 198 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 5.6% (as at 8 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Tom McGuinness do best at?
- Gowran Park by strike rate: 0 wins from 32 runners (0%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Tom McGuinness?
- Killian Leonard, with 54 runners since 2008 — 27% of the total. That pairing has won 1 (1.9%).
- Is Tom McGuinness in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Tom McGuinness's Fair A/E?
- 1.61, from 197 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.