Louisa Carberry
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 20 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 11% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.29). In Group and Graded company the record reads 16% (110 runs).
In Group and Graded company the record reads well at 16.4% (n=110, Fair A/E 1.60), but new recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 0% (n=44, Fair A/E 0.00). Horses returning fresh after 61+ days are the standout value angle: 9.5% strikes only just below baseline, but Fair A/E 1.22 and +15.90 to a £1 stake over 158 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Peter Carberry rides 13% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (9.3%, A/E 1.09) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well off a 31-60-day break (18.6%, n=59). The record reads poorly in Flat races — 2.3% over 43 runners, 8.9pts below the baseline. 18 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Grand Steeple-Chase de Paris at Auteuil (FR) (May 2024, £352,174). The stable star of the record: Gran Diose (FR) — 10 wins from 30 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Apr–May.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2014→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 411 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 411 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 16 March 2014 to 9 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Louisa Carberry's strike rate?
- Louisa Carberry has won 46 of 411 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 11.2% (as at 12 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Louisa Carberry do best at?
- Compiegne (FR) by strike rate: 12 wins from 79 runners (15.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Louisa Carberry?
- Peter Carberry, with 54 runners since 2008 — 13% of the total. That pairing has won 5 (9.3%).
- Is Louisa Carberry in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Louisa Carberry's Fair A/E?
- 1.29, from 400 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.