Skip to content
Trainer profile

Peter John Flood

139 runners in the last 5 seasons · 44 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 2 days ago 91% of runners over jumps
from 1 Jan 2022
9–139
Wins / Runs
6.5%
Strike rate
n=139
25 (18%)
Placed
1.60
n=139 · 1.27 incl. margin
−31.50
£1 level stake
n=139 at SP · −22.7%
£111k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
10%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 30 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 7% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.60).

Deterministic profile computed from 139 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Miss Georgie Benson: 7.4% from 54
The read

Debutants struggle at 0% (n=30, Fair A/E 0.00). Miss Georgie Benson rides 39% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (7.4%, A/E 1.84) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good going (11.1%, n=54) and in Hurdle races (9.6%, n=73). The record reads poorly on Good to Soft going — 0% over 30 runners, 6.5pts below the baseline.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 6.5% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
3.2%−3.3
n=31 · A/E 1.03 · £1 −10.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
10%+3.5
n=10 · A/E 3.44 · £1 +0.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−6.5
n=30 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −30.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
16.7%+10.2
n=6 · A/E 3.48 · £1 +0.50
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
33.3%+26.8
n=6 · A/E 7.03 · £1 +8.50
When favourite
33.3%
n=3 · A/E 1.79 · £1 +2.50
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
4.8%−1.7
n=83 · A/E 1.28 · £1 −15.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−6.5
n=1 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −1.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
On Good to Soft going 0% vs 6.5% · n=30
With debutants 0% vs 6.5% · n=30
On Good going 11.1% vs 6.5% · n=54
In NH Flat races 2.6% vs 6.5% · n=39
In Hurdle races 9.6% vs 6.5% · n=73
With horses switching code 3.2% vs 6.5% · n=31
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Hurdle 73 7 9.6% +6.50
NH Flat 39 1 2.6% −32.00
Chase 14 1 7.1% +7.00
Flat 13 0 0% −13.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Good 54 6 11.1% −10.50
Soft 42 3 7.1% +22.00
Good to Soft 30 0 0% −30.00
Heavy 11 0 0% −11.00
Standard (AW) 2 0 0% −2.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Punchestown 19 1 5.3% +2.00
Sligo 10 0 0% −10.00
Naas 8 0 0% −8.00
Wexford 8 1 12.5% −1.00
Fairyhouse 8 0 0% −8.00
Roscommon 7 0 0% −7.00
Ballinrobe 7 4 57.1% +26.00
Kilbeggan 7 0 0% −7.00
Limerick 6 0 0% −6.00
Downpatrick 5 0 0% −5.00
Galway 5 0 0% −5.00
Leopardstown 5 1 20% +29.00
Tipperary 5 0 0% −5.00
Bellewstown 4 0 0% −4.00
Tramore 4 0 0% −4.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 4 3 0 0% −3.00
Class 2 2 0 0% −2.00
Class 1 1 0 0% −1.00
Class 3 1 0 0% −1.00
Class 5 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 5 2 40% 2.34 +6.50
2nd–3rd fav 8 1 12.5% 1.05 −1.50
4th–6th fav 33 4 12.1% 2.03 +1.50
7th+ in betting 93 2 2.2% 1.09 −38.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Jumping record

completion over obstacles · same window as header
83.9% completed · 87 obstacle runners (chases & hurdles)
CodeRCompFURPUBDOth
Chase 14 78.6% 1 1 1 0 0
Hurdle 73 84.9% 0 1 10 0 0
Chases and hurdles only — bumpers have no obstacles, so completion is not a question there. F fell · UR unseated rider · PU pulled up · BD brought down · Oth covers refusals, slip-ups, run-outs and the rare disqualification. Non-runners are excluded throughout. Rows under n=30 are shown faded. A descriptive record, not a tip.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Tullypole Annie (IRE)from G A Kingston · then Mrs Lorna Fowler 13 3 7 14 Apr 23
Annie Button (IRE) 11 1 3 26 Sep 26
Morning Mayhem (GB)then Nick Scholfield 7 0 0 20 Sep 25
Parkrunner (IRE) 7 0 0 10 Jun 23
Knockiel Synge (IRE)from D Harvey 6 1 3 28 Apr 26
Caulaincourt (IRE)from G M Lyons 6 0 0 30 Mar 25
Liberty Flame (IRE)then Stuart Coltherd 6 0 2 25 Aug 23
Can Happen (IRE)from Mark Fahey 5 2 3 19 Sep 26
Matthews Hill (IRE) 5 0 1 11 Nov 23
Trevena (GB)from Ciaran Murphy · then Patrick T Foley 5 1 2 2 Aug 22
Finjimk (IRE)then Nick Scholfield 4 0 0 1 Aug 26
Mi Sueno (IRE)from A Kinsella · then Paddy Butler 4 0 1 30 Jun 23
All 44 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 44 horses listed, 12 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Ciaran Murphy (2); 32 had their first archived run for this yard.

16 have since run for another yard, most often for Patrick T Foley (3) and Nick Scholfield (2); 28 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 1
Only 1 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
0008150110140010
A jumps yard: the season runs Oct–Apr. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
39% of all rides
7.4% SR · A/E 1.84
RiderRWSR£1
Miss Georgie Benson 54 4 7.4% +14.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2020→
10
Archived wins
£122k
Prize money
2022
Best season · 4 wins
Tullypole Annie (IRE) — Careers at dornangroup.com Novice Handicap Hurdle Leopardstown · Dec 2022
£11,800
Knockiel Synge (IRE) — Kildare Hunt Club Cross Country Chase For The Ladies Perpetual Cup Punchestown · Apr 2024
£8,850
Can Happen (IRE) — Start Your Racing TV Free Trial Now Ladies Handicap Hurdle Navan (IRE) · Sep 2026
£7,200

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Dragon Pulse (IRE) 21.4% · 3–14
Progeny have won 8.9% of 4,261 runs since 2008 (320 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 13.3% from 570. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 5% from 363.
Vadamos (FR) 14.3% · 2–14
Progeny have won 9.6% of 2,084 runs since 2008 (218 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5.2% from 155.
Sans Frontieres (IRE) 9.1% · 1–11
Progeny have won 8.9% of 1,252 runs since 2008 (155 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 14.2% from 183.
Affinisea (IRE) 0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 13% of 1,255 runs since 2008 (198 horses).
Dragon Dancer (GB) 0% · 0–7
Progeny have won 8.8% of 566 runs since 2008 (80 horses).
Progeny have won 13.2% of 6,941 runs since 2008 (691 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 174 · newest first

The latest 50 of 174 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 10 November 2020 to 20 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Peter John Flood's strike rate?
Peter John Flood has won 9 of 139 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 6.5% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Who rides most for Peter John Flood?
Miss Georgie Benson, with 54 runners since 2022 — 39% of the total. That pairing has won 4 (7.4%).
Is Peter John Flood in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Peter John Flood's Fair A/E?
1.60, from 139 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).