Skip to content
Trainer profile

Stephanie Cassidy

76 runners in the last 5 seasons · 14 individual horses
As at 20 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 5 days ago 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
2–76
Wins / Runs
2.6%
Strike rate
n=76
9 (12%)
Placed
0.57
n=76 · 0.48 incl. margin
−24.00
£1 level stake
n=76 at SP · −31.6%
£23,245
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB at a glance Claiming riders: 5.9%

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 2.6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
0%−2.6
n=18 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −18.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−2.6
n=14 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −14.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−2.6
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
0%−2.6
n=9 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −9.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
5.9%+3.3
n=34 · A/E 1.69 · £1 +18.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 2.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
With a new jockey booking 6.1% vs 2.6% · n=33
With claiming riders up 5.9% vs 2.6% · n=34
On Standard (AW) going 3.3% vs 2.6% · n=61 · A/E 0.73
In Class 6 2.9% vs 2.6% · n=70 · A/E 0.60
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 61 2 3.3% −9.00
Good to Firm 9 0 0% −9.00
Good to Soft 2 0 0% −2.00
Good 2 0 0% −2.00
Firm 1 0 0% −1.00
Soft 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Lingfield (AW) 34 1 2.9% +7.00
Wolverhampton (AW) 12 1 8.3% −1.00
Southwell (AW) 8 0 0% −8.00
Chelmsford City (AW) 7 0 0% −7.00
Yarmouth 4 0 0% −4.00
Lingfield 4 0 0% −4.00
Brighton 3 0 0% −3.00
Bath 1 0 0% −1.00
Windsor 1 0 0% −1.00
Newmarket 1 0 0% −1.00
Leicester 1 0 0% −1.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 70 2 2.9% −18.00
Class 5 5 0 0% −5.00
Class 4 1 0 0% −1.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
2nd–3rd fav 4 0 0% 0.00 −4.00
4th–6th fav 20 1 5% 0.73 −9.00
7th+ in betting 52 1 1.9% 0.69 −11.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Laurentia (IRE)from John E Long 19 0 5 31 Jan 26
So Chic (IRE)from John E Long 15 2 3 13 Oct 26
Pure Theory (GB)from Eve Johnson Houghton 12 0 1 10 Sep 26
Pink Socks (IRE)from Ian Williams 8 0 0 15 Oct 26
Alfa Moonstone (GB)from Craig Lidster 5 0 0 2 Aug 25
Molly Valentine (IRE)from Clare Hobson 4 0 0 28 Sep 26
Mary Rose (GB)from Brett Johnson 3 0 0 25 Feb 26
Arlo's Sunshine (GB)from John E Long 3 0 0 14 Jan 26
Minshaar (GB)from Richard Fahey 2 0 0 28 Jul 26
Dancing Terror (GB)from Amanda Perrett 1 0 0 4 Aug 26
Timeless Spirit (GB)from Paul Attwater 1 0 0 13 Oct 25
Kitty Bennet (GB)from John E Long 1 0 0 15 Aug 25
All 14 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 14 horses listed, 14 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from John E Long (5).

None of them has a later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 2
Only 2 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
0090000140000
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
Liam Wright 15 1 6.7% +26.00
Ryan Kavanagh 8 0 0% −8.00
Tyler Heard 8 0 0% −8.00
Jack Doughty 6 1 16.7% +5.00
William Carson 6 0 0% −6.00
Oliver Carmichael 4 0 0% −4.00
Rhys Clutterbuck 3 0 0% −3.00
Mr Jake Holman 3 0 0% −3.00
Hollie Doyle 3 0 0% −3.00
Gina Mangan 3 0 0% −3.00
Callum Shepherd 2 0 0% −2.00
Georgia Dobie 2 0 0% −2.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2024→
2
Archived wins
£23,245
Prize money
2025
Best season · 2 wins
So Chic (IRE) — Download The Raceday Ready App Handicap (AWT) (Div 1) Lingfield (AW) · Aug 2025 · Class 6
£4,711
So Chic (IRE) — Boost Your Acca With BetMGM Classified Stakes (Div 3) Wolverhampton (AW) · Mar 2025 · Class 6
£3,140
Notable horses

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Iffraaj (GB) 0% · 0–19
Progeny have won 10.6% of 13,950 runs since 2008 (1,089 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 7.6% from 489.
Exceed And Excel (AUS) 13.3% · 2–15
Progeny have won 11.9% of 16,025 runs since 2008 (1,161 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 20.7% from 198. Weakest on Soft going: 7.9% from 1,194.
Ulysses (IRE) 0% · 0–12
Progeny have won 10.6% of 2,969 runs since 2008 (293 horses).
Vadamos (FR) 0% · 0–8
Progeny have won 9.7% of 2,082 runs since 2008 (217 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5.2% from 155.
Havana Grey (GB) 0% · 0–5
Progeny have won 13.3% of 4,533 runs since 2008 (415 horses). Strongest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 16.3% from 104. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 10.3% from 408.
Cable Bay (IRE) 0% · 0–4
Progeny have won 9.9% of 3,711 runs since 2008 (243 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 13.9% from 641. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 5.5% from 290.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 20 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 76 · newest first

The latest 50 of 76 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 October 2024 to 15 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
28 Jul 26 Yarmouth Minshaar (GB)J: Liam Wright Get Raceday Ready Handicap StakesClass 6 · 7f · Good To Firm · 9 ran 9th 40/1
08 Jul 26 Yarmouth Pure Theory (GB)J: Liam Wright Haven HandicapClass 6 · 10f · Good To Firm · 7 ran 5th 50/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Stephanie Cassidy's strike rate?
Stephanie Cassidy has won 2 of 76 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 2.6% (as at 20 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Stephanie Cassidy do best at?
Lingfield (AW) by strike rate: 1 wins from 34 runners (2.9%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Is Stephanie Cassidy in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Stephanie Cassidy's Fair A/E?
0.57, from 76 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 20 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).