No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
40–669
Wins / Runs
6%
Strike rate
n=669
135 (20%)
Placed
0.87
Fair A/E
n=668 · 0.74 incl. margin
−311.42
£1 level stake
n=669 at SP · −46.6%
£201k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
2.9%
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Yard Profile
Sent out around 70 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 6% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.87). With a claiming rider up the record reads 11% (211 runs).
Deterministic profile computed from 669 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 15 Oct 2026
KTB at a glanceFired Jun–AugMark Grant: 3.4% from 88Claiming riders: 10.9%
The read
The record is strongest at Bath (21.3%, n=61), clear of the yard's 6% baseline. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a positive signal at 10.9% (n=211, Fair A/E 1.45). Mark Grant rode 13% of the entries and sits below the yard's average (3.4% vs 6%, A/E 0.53). The yard also read well off a 0-7-day break (17.1%, n=35) and beyond 3m (13.2%, n=38). The record read poorly over 2m5f – 3m — 0% over 79 runners, 6pts below the baseline. 3 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Mares' NH Novices' Hcp Hurdle at Newbury (Apr 2005, £29,000). The stable star of the record was Glens Wobbly (GB) — 7 wins from 62 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fired Jun–Aug.
Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
4.4%−1.6
n=183 · A/E 0.93 · £1 −87.50
New recruits · first run for the yard
9.5%+3.5
n=21 · A/E 1.81 · £1 −11.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−6.0
n=25 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −25.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
4.3%−1.7
n=23 · A/E 0.61 · £1 −21.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
4.5%−1.5
n=22 · A/E 0.82 · £1 −12.00
When favourite
18.5%
n=27 · A/E 0.69 · £1 −8.25
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
10.9%+4.9
n=211 · A/E 1.45 · £1 −14.25
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−6.0
n=10 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −10.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
At Bath21.3% vs 6% · n=61
Off a 0-7-day break17.1% vs 6% · n=35
With claiming riders up10.9% vs 6% · n=211
Over 2m5f – 3m0% vs 6% · n=79
Beyond 3m13.2% vs 6% · n=38
With C&D winners11.8% vs 6% · n=85
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Race type
TypeRWSR£1
Flat357277.6%−127.75
Hurdle15831.9%−131.50
Chase11176.3%−74.17
NH Flat4337%+22.00
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Good16363.7%−111.75
Soft12375.7%−69.67
Standard (AW)12254.1%−81.00
Good to Soft10532.9%−56.75
Good to Firm991010.1%−10.00
Heavy32412.5%+5.00
Firm25520%+12.75
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Bath611321.3%+22.25
Plumpton51611.8%−12.17
Lingfield (AW)5024%−38.50
Kempton (AW)4324.7%−16.00
Chepstow39410.3%+13.00
Newbury3500%−35.00
Fontwell3100%−31.00
Lingfield2727.4%−13.00
Wincanton2700%−27.00
Salisbury2400%−24.00
Taunton2414.2%−14.00
Windsor2114.8%−4.00
Kempton1900%−19.00
Warwick17211.8%−7.50
Exeter1600%−16.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 5261197.3%−109.92
Class 419142.1%−121.00
Class 61661710.2%−29.50
Class 32800%−28.00
Class 11200%−12.00
Class 2800%−8.00
Class 7200%−2.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite34720.6%0.78−10.00
2nd–3rd fav871314.9%1.07−23.42
4th–6th fav187147.5%0.97−43.00
7th+ in betting36161.7%0.56−235.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
1m5f – 2m13585.9%−42.50
1m2f – 1m4f12797.1%−44.00
2m1f – 2m4f12264.9%−79.50
6f – 7f9044.4%−28.00
2m5f – 3m7900%−79.00
1m – 1m1f69811.6%−21.25
Over 3m38513.2%−8.17
Under 6f900%−9.00
By season
By seasonRWSR£1
200820894.3%−118.50
200912753.9%−56.25
201010330%+4.50
20115858.6%−21.00
20123425.9%−27.67
20135623.6%−38.50
201448612.5%+16.00
20155135.9%−37.00
20164249.5%−5.00
20173512.9%−28.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps512367%−221.92
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners20683.9%−112.00
8-10 runners198115.6%−114.17
14-16 runners10932.8%−43.75
5-7 runners1071514%−15.00
17+ runners3500%−35.00
2-4 runners14321.4%+8.50
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
The 60 most-raced of 80 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 60 horses listed, 17 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Andrew Balding (4) and W J Burke (2); 43 had their first archived run for this yard.
17 have since run for another yard, most often for David Weston (2) and Jimmy Fox (2); 43 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
When the yard fires
strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
03353148766811
Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".
Career highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→
87
Archived wins
3
Pattern / graded wins
£702k
Prize money
2006
Best season · 20 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Progeny have won 11.1% of 287 runs since 2008 (20 horses).
Dr Fong (USA)7% · 4–57
Progeny have won 9.4% of 4,593 runs since 2008 (350 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 5.1% from 158.
Dansili (GB)0% · 0–43
Progeny have won 13.7% of 11,841 runs since 2008 (983 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 16.8% from 101. Weakest on Heavy going: 7.9% from 428. Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 9.1% from 209.
Progeny have won 9.8% of 4,515 runs since 2008 (297 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5.6% from 177.
Accordion (IRE)8.3% · 2–24
Progeny have won 10.8% of 3,309 runs since 2008 (327 horses).
Compton Place (GB)4.5% · 1–22
Progeny have won 8.5% of 8,347 runs since 2008 (515 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 11.5% from 165.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 15 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 1,439 · newest first
The latest 50 of 1,439 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 30 November 2017.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Jonathan Geake's strike rate?
Jonathan Geake has won 40 of 669 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 6% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Jonathan Geake do best at?
Bath by strike rate: 13 wins from 61 runners (21.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Jonathan Geake?
Mark Grant, with 88 runners since 2008 — 13% of the total. That pairing has won 3 (3.4%).
What is Jonathan Geake's Fair A/E?
0.87, from 668 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Jonathan Geake·SR 6%·A/E 0.87
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy