Katy Price
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 50 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 8% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.86).
The record is strongest at Exeter (14.9%, n=47), clear of the yard's 7.5% baseline. Debutants struggle at 1.7% (n=58, Fair A/E 0.44). The market has consistently overbet runners with a claiming rider up: 6.6% strike, Fair A/E 0.78 and −168.42 to a £1 stake over 349 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Ben Poste rides 49% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (7.1%, A/E 0.87). The yard also reads well on Good to Firm going (16.7%, n=42). The record reads poorly in Flat races — 0% over 38 runners, 7.5pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard off a break of 180+ days: Fair A/E 0.21 across 83 runners (1.2% strike, −78.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the bet365 Staffordshire Plate at Uttoxeter (May 2018, £21,896). The stable star of the record: Minellacelebration (IRE) — 11 wins from 45 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Mar–Jul.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2015→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 895 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 895 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 20 October 2015 to 8 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Katy Price's strike rate?
- Katy Price has won 67 of 895 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 7.5% (as at 9 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Katy Price do best at?
- Exeter by strike rate: 7 wins from 47 runners (14.9%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Katy Price?
- Ben Poste, with 438 runners since 2008 — 49% of the total. That pairing has won 31 (7.1%).
- Is Katy Price in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 3 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Katy Price's Fair A/E?
- 0.86, from 894 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.