Susan Gardner
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 90 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 8% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.06). With a claiming rider up the record reads 10% (984 runs).
Debutants struggle at 0.8% (n=133, Fair A/E 0.28). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 4.1% strike, Fair A/E 0.69 and −215.17 to a £1 stake over 392 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Lucy Gardner rides 53% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (8.1%, A/E 1.01) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (19.4%, n=62) and beyond 3m (14.3%, n=175). One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd Silver Bar Handicap at Newbury (Apr 2019, £24,900). The stable star of the record: Orion Express (GB) — 10 wins from 74 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Mar–Jun.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 8.1% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 8.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,924 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,924 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 21 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 17 Oct 2026: fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 17 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Susan Gardner's strike rate?
- Susan Gardner has won 146 of 1,796 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 8.1% (as at 4 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Susan Gardner do best at?
- Exeter by strike rate: 41 wins from 378 runners (10.8%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Susan Gardner?
- Lucy Gardner, with 946 runners since 2008 — 53% of the total. That pairing has won 77 (8.1%).
- What is Susan Gardner's Fair A/E?
- 1.06, from 1,794 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.