Skip to content
Trainer profile

Natalie Lloyd-Beavis

344 runners in the lifetime window · 82 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Jun 2021
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
12–344
Wins / Runs
3.5%
Strike rate
n=344
41 (12%)
Placed
0.81
n=344 · 0.70 incl. margin
−145.25
£1 level stake
n=344 at SP · −42.2%
£71,316
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
0%
KTB Yard Profile

Sent out around 30 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.81).

Deterministic profile computed from 344 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fired Sep–Oct Claiming riders: 3.7%
The read

The market has consistently overbet runners with a claiming rider up: 3.7% strike, Fair A/E 0.83 and −92.25 to a £1 stake over 189 runners — those runners underperformed what the price implied. The yard also read well off a 31-60-day break (8.1%, n=37). The market has also underrated the yard over 1m2f – 1m4f: Fair A/E 1.58 across 79 runners (6.3% strike, +22.00 to a £1 stake). The record read poorly off a break of 180+ days — 0% over 53 runners, 3.5pts below the baseline. Seasonally, the yard fired Sep–Oct.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 3.5% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
2%−1.5
n=98 · A/E 0.69 · £1 −20.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
1.5%−2.0
n=65 · A/E 0.43 · £1 −55.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−3.5
n=18 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −18.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
7.7%+4.2
n=13 · A/E 1.79 · £1 −3.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
5%+1.5
n=20 · A/E 1.52 · £1 −11.00
When favourite
0%
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
3.7%+0.2
n=189 · A/E 0.83 · £1 −92.25

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 3.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Off a 31-60-day break 8.1% vs 3.5% · n=37
Off a break of 180+ days 0% vs 3.5% · n=53
Over 1m2f – 1m4f 6.3% vs 3.5% · n=79
In Chase races 6.1% vs 3.5% · n=33
On Good to Soft going 5.9% vs 3.5% · n=34
With new recruits 1.5% vs 3.5% · n=65
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 237 9 3.8% −91.00
Hurdle 63 1 1.6% −22.00
Chase 33 2 6.1% −21.25
NH Flat 11 0 0% −11.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 135 3 2.2% −53.00
Good 89 4 4.5% −57.25
Good to Firm 45 1 2.2% −38.50
Good to Soft 34 2 5.9% +12.50
Soft 28 1 3.6% −17.00
Heavy 7 0 0% −7.00
Firm 6 1 16.7% +15.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Kempton (AW) 51 1 2% +16.00
Wolverhampton (AW) 35 1 2.9% −30.00
Lingfield (AW) 25 0 0% −25.00
Brighton 22 3 13.6% +5.50
Worcester 19 0 0% −19.00
Chepstow 17 1 5.9% −8.00
Bath 16 0 0% −16.00
Southwell (AW) 12 1 8.3% −2.00
Windsor 12 0 0% −12.00
Chelmsford City (AW) 11 0 0% −11.00
Fontwell 10 0 0% −10.00
Lingfield 9 1 11.1% −2.50
Stratford 9 0 0% −9.00
Uttoxeter 9 1 11.1% −5.25
Wincanton 8 0 0% −8.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 169 6 3.6% −120.00
Class 5 104 3 2.9% −33.00
Class 4 53 2 3.8% −41.25
Class 7 12 1 8.3% +55.00
Class 3 3 0 0% −3.00
Class 2 2 0 0% −2.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 11 2 18.2% 0.83 −1.75
2nd–3rd fav 16 2 12.5% 0.81 −2.00
4th–6th fav 67 4 6% 0.99 −1.50
7th+ in betting 250 4 1.6% 0.68 −140.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Roly Tricks (GB)from Olly Stevens 18 4 6 6 Sep 16
Tax Reform (IRE)from Gary Moore 13 0 2 14 Jul 16
Evergreen Forest (IRE)from Alastair Lidderdale · then Jim Best 13 0 1 29 Sep 14
Deftera Lad (IRE)from Pat Phelan · then Sylvester Kirk 12 1 5 24 Jul 18
Leyland (IRE)from Lawney Hill 12 0 1 30 Nov 16
Deftera Fantutte (IRE)from Pat Phelan 11 0 2 25 May 17
Christophers Quest (GB)from Tony Carroll 11 0 0 29 Jul 11
Meirig's Dream (IRE)from Brendan Powell · then Philip Hobbs 10 0 3 22 Apr 12
Spring Dixie (IRE)from John Ryan 9 0 0 22 Feb 19
Edward Elgar (GB)from Richard Whitaker · then Caroline Bailey 9 1 3 29 Nov 15
Carla Koala (GB)then Tony Newcombe 8 0 0 31 Oct 19
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 82 horses sent out in this window — each ran at least 2 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 48 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Andrew Haynes (4) and Dai Williams (3); 12 had their first archived run for this yard.

28 have since run for another yard, most often for Barry Brennan (6) and Tim Vaughan (3); 32 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
080000935544
Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
RiderRWSR£1
David Bass 21 0 0% −21.00
Philip Prince 19 0 0% −19.00
Paddy Pilley 19 3 15.8% +8.50
Charlie Bennett 19 0 0% −19.00
Mr Will Pettis 14 0 0% −14.00
James Davies 12 0 0% −12.00
Paul Fitzsimons 11 0 0% −11.00
Timmy Murphy 11 2 18.2% +3.00
Daniel Hiskett 10 2 20% +1.75
Aaron Jones 10 1 10% −3.50
Kevin Jones 9 0 0% −9.00
Thomas Garner 9 0 0% −9.00
Muted rows are under 30 rides.

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2009→
12
Archived wins
£71,316
Prize money
2015
Best season · 4 wins
Gentleman Moore (IRE) — newtonabbotracing.com Handicap Chase Newton Abbot · Jul 2019 · Class 4
£6,758
Gentleman Moore (IRE) — Geens Chartered Accountants Handicap Chase Uttoxeter · Sep 2019 · Class 4
£4,289
Joules (GB) — N-ergy Unlocking Potential And Transforming Lives Handicap Chepstow · Jul 2016 · Class 5
£3,235

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Pastoral Pursuits (GB) 19% · 4–21
Progeny have won 9.5% of 7,217 runs since 2008 (437 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 17.4% from 109. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 1.5% from 133.
Royal Anthem (USA) 14.3% · 2–14
Progeny have won 9.9% of 1,350 runs since 2008 (115 horses). Strongest on Good going: 12.9% from 529.
Haafhd (GB) 0% · 0–13
Progeny have won 10.9% of 4,750 runs since 2008 (305 horses).
Namid (GB) 0% · 0–13
Progeny have won 8.2% of 4,102 runs since 2008 (276 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 2.4% from 164. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 0.8% from 119.
Fast Company (IRE) 8.3% · 1–12
Progeny have won 9.4% of 7,591 runs since 2008 (492 horses). Strongest on Heavy going: 12.7% from 557. Strongest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 12.8% from 109.
Peintre Celebre (USA) 0% · 0–12
Progeny have won 11.8% of 2,836 runs since 2008 (311 horses). Weakest on Standard (AW) going: 8.3% from 734. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 8.2% from 291.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 344 · newest first

The latest 50 of 344 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 24 September 2009 to 30 June 2021.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
26 Aug 19 Chepstow Coastguard Watch (FR)J: Hector Crouch interbet.com HandicapClass 6 · 12f · Good · 11 ran 11th 50/1
23 May 19 Chepstow Dandy Lad (IRE)J: Philip Prince Polo At The Manor HandicapClass 6 · 7f · Good To Firm · 12 ran 12th 50/1
01 May 19 Southwell (AW) Carla Koala (GB)J: Aaron Jones Attheraces.com HandicapClass 6 · 5f · Standard · 9 ran 7th 14/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Natalie Lloyd-Beavis's strike rate?
Natalie Lloyd-Beavis has won 12 of 344 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 3.5% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Natalie Lloyd-Beavis do best at?
Wolverhampton (AW) by strike rate: 1 wins from 35 runners (2.9%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
What is Natalie Lloyd-Beavis's Fair A/E?
0.81, from 344 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).