T G McCourt
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 200 runners a season, winning with 5% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.89).
The record is strongest at Listowel (16.7%, n=30), Downpatrick (11%, n=109) and Sligo (11%, n=109) — all clear of the yard's 5.1% baseline. Debutants struggle at 1.3% (n=150, Fair A/E 0.78). The market has consistently overbet a horse having headgear put back on after a bare run: 2.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.60 and −116.50 to a £1 stake over 240 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. James Ryan rides 15% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (6.6%, A/E 1.10) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The stable star of the record: Dollar Value (USA) — 12 wins from 67 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 5.1% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 4,845 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 4,845 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 1 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 21 Oct 2026: top-rated on KTB Rating in 2 runs (won 0) · to 28 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is T G McCourt's strike rate?
- T G McCourt has won 197 of 3,891 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 5.1% (as at 12 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does T G McCourt do best at?
- Downpatrick by strike rate: 12 wins from 109 runners (11%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for T G McCourt?
- James Ryan, with 602 runners since 2008 — 15% of the total. That pairing has won 40 (6.6%).
- Is T G McCourt in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 4 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is T G McCourt's Fair A/E?
- 0.89, from 3,888 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.