As at 29 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Nov 2005100% of runners on the flat
Archive record 2005
No runners from 1 Jan 2008, where our aggregate statistics normally begin — showing the full archive record instead, 10 Jan 2005 to 2 Nov 2005. Figures that need a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time since a run, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are left out: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
KTB Yard Profile
Sent out 153 runners in our archive record (2005), almost all on the flat, winning with 12% of them — beating the margin-free market read across that record (Fair A/E 1.07).
Deterministic profile computed from 153 archived runs (archive record 2005) · updated 29 Oct 2026
The read
The yard also read well in Class 5 (17.6%, n=68). The record read poorly over 6f – 7f — 5.7% over 53 runners, 6.1pts below the baseline.
Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.8% baseline
When favourite
22.7%
n=22 · A/E 1.01 · £1 −4.45
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
12.5%+0.7
n=8 · A/E 0.83 · £1 −3.00
Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. Tiles that depend on a horse's earlier runs (debuts, time off, first-time headgear, new connections, last-time-out winners) are not shown on an archive-era record: for runs this early our archive cannot see what came before.
Notable angles
vs their own baseline
In Class 517.6% vs 11.8% · n=68
Over 6f – 7f5.7% vs 11.8% · n=53
With Leandro D Goncalves5.4% vs 11.8% · n=37
In Class 46.8% vs 11.8% · n=44
On Good to Firm going8.2% vs 11.8% · n=49
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.
Record by conditions
same window as header
Going
GoingRWSR£1
Good to Firm4948.2%−31.25
Good46613%+17.50
Good to Soft17211.8%−0.50
Soft17211.8%−8.75
Firm1218.3%−7.67
Standard (AW)9333.3%+30.05
Heavy300%−3.00
Courses
CourseRWSR£1
Doncaster1915.3%−14.00
Catterick17211.8%−7.17
Thirsk16212.5%+4.50
Pontefract11218.2%+6.00
Ripon1119.1%−7.75
Nottingham1000%−10.00
Redcar900%−9.00
Ayr8112.5%−3.50
Beverley700%−7.00
Haydock7342.9%+5.50
Newcastle6116.7%−2.25
Wolverhampton (AW)6116.7%+28.00
Leicester500%−5.00
Chester4125%+17.00
Newmarket300%−3.00
Class
ClassRWSR£1
Class 5681217.6%+24.05
Class 44436.8%−31.67
Class 321314.3%+24.00
Class 21100%−11.00
Class 6900%−9.00
Market position
In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite28828.6%1.32+1.80
2nd–3rd fav41512.2%0.84−17.42
4th–6th fav4212.4%0.30−31.00
7th+ in betting4249.5%2.67+43.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.
Distance
DistanceRWSR£1
6f – 7f5335.7%−22.17
1m2f – 1m4f37410.8%−19.75
Under 6f34411.8%+18.30
1m – 1m1f22522.7%+20.25
1m5f – 2m6233.3%+0.75
2m1f – 2m4f100%−1.00
Handicaps
HandicapsRWSR£1
Handicaps1171613.7%+27.33
Field size
Field sizeRWSR£1
11-13 runners561017.9%+43.08
8-10 runners36411.1%−14.45
14-16 runners2913.4%−12.00
17+ runners2528%−16.50
5-7 runners600%−6.00
2-4 runners11100%+2.25
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
All 24 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next
Of the 24 horses listed, 20 have since run for another yard, most often for A Dickman (4) and Richard Fahey (2); 4 have no later run for another yard in our archive.
Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. Where a horse came from is not stated on an archive-era record: our archive cannot see before 2005. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.
When the yard fires
strike by month, 2005
JFMAMJJASOND
010050121041233800·
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".
Career highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→
18
Archived wins
£143k
Prize money
2005
Best season · 18 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. On this page the header statistics and this card both count from the archive floor (2005), so they agree.
Tanforan (GB) — Halliwell Jones BMW - Mile Handicap) Chester · Jul 2005 · Class 3
£9,787
Along The Nile (GB) — Unison Sharlston Rovers Champions Handicap Pontefract · Aug 2005 · Class 3
£9,340
Bishops Court (GB) — Blue Square Handicap Epsom Downs · Apr 2005 · Class 3
Progeny have won 6.9% of 348 runs since 2005 (37 horses).
Mujahid (USA)21.4% · 3–14
Progeny have won 10.1% of 3,739 runs since 2005 (195 horses). Weakest at trips under 6f (all codes): 7.1% from 353.
Desert Prince (IRE)30% · 3–10
Progeny have won 9.3% of 4,883 runs since 2005 (302 horses).
Diktat (GB)10% · 1–10
Progeny have won 7.9% of 7,115 runs since 2005 (461 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 4.9% from 162.
Royal Academy (USA)30% · 3–10
Progeny have won 8.1% of 1,136 runs since 2005 (107 horses). Strongest on Soft going: 12.4% from 137. Strongest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 12.5% from 240. Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 4.6% from 194.
Halling (USA)22.2% · 2–9
Progeny have won 11.4% of 7,548 runs since 2005 (490 horses). Weakest over 2m5f – 3m (all codes): 4.6% from 219.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2005, as at 29 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.
The record
latest 50 of 153 · newest first
The latest 50 of 153 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 10 January 2005 to 2 November 2005.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
What is Mrs J R Ramsden's strike rate?
Mrs J R Ramsden has won 18 of 153 runners in 2005, a strike rate of 11.8% (as at 29 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive. Our archive begins in 2005, so anything earlier is not counted.
What is Mrs J R Ramsden's Fair A/E?
1.07, from 152 runners with a computed fair probability in 2005. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Mrs J R Ramsden·SR 11.8%·A/E 1.07
1Tap Share in the toolbar2Scroll down the sheet3Tap Add to Home Screen, then Add
1Open your browser's menu (the three dots)2Tap Add to Home screen or Install app
KTB
Cookies on Kickthebookies
We use essential cookies to run the site and remember your betslip. No advertising or tracking cookies, ever. By continuing to use this site, you agree. Cookie policy