Laura Mongan
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 70 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.94).
Runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 0% (n=37, Fair A/E 0.00). Luke Morris rides 23% of the entries and beats the yard's average (9.3% vs 4.2%, A/E 1.72) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The record reads poorly off a 8-14-day break — 0% over 37 runners, 4.2pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard off a 61-180-day break: Fair A/E 0.50 across 66 runners (1.5% strike, −59.50 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 3 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Ladbrokes St Leger Stakes at Doncaster (Sep 2016, £396,970). The stable star of the record: Skidby Mill (IRE) — 9 wins from 63 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 4.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 4.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, 5 seasonsJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,404 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,404 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 6 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 6 Oct 2026: top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · to 6 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Laura Mongan's strike rate?
- Laura Mongan has won 14 of 330 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 4.2% (as at 1 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Laura Mongan do best at?
- Lingfield (AW) by strike rate: 8 wins from 154 runners (5.2%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Laura Mongan?
- Luke Morris, with 75 runners since 2022 — 23% of the total. That pairing has won 7 (9.3%).
- What is Laura Mongan's Fair A/E?
- 0.94, from 330 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.