Henry Candy
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 190 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 12% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.03). In Group and Graded company the record reads 16% (332 runs).
It is weakest at Ascot (5% over 119 runners) — the widest gap in the record. In Group and Graded company the record reads well at 16% (n=332, Fair A/E 1.39), but a horse in first-time headgear has been a poor signal at 4.6% (n=87, Fair A/E 0.49). Dane O'Neill rides 28% of the entries and edges the yard's average (14.5% vs 12.1%, A/E 1.10) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. 53 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Diamond Jubilee Stakes at Ascot (Jun 2016, £340,260). The stable star of the record: Limato (IRE) — 14 wins from 31 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 12.1% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 12.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 4,027 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 4,027 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 5 April 2005 to 31 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 12 Oct 2026: top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 1) · to 13 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Henry Candy's strike rate?
- Henry Candy has won 425 of 3,526 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 12.1% (as at 31 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Henry Candy do best at?
- Newmarket by strike rate: 25 wins from 160 runners (15.6%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Henry Candy?
- Dane O'Neill, with 987 runners since 2008 — 28% of the total. That pairing has won 143 (14.5%).
- Is Henry Candy in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 8 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Henry Candy's Fair A/E?
- 1.03, from 3,515 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.