John & Rhys Flint
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 20 runners a season, winning with 7% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.94).
The record is strongest at Chepstow (15.6%, n=77), clear of the yard's 7.2% baseline. Horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 3% (n=67, Fair A/E 0.67). The market has consistently overbet runners with a claiming rider up: 6.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.76 and −39.04 to a £1 stake over 131 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. The yard also reads well in Class 6 (11.1%, n=153) and on Good to Firm going (10.6%, n=94). The record reads poorly on Good to Soft going — 0% over 50 runners, 7.2pts below the baseline. Seasonally, the yard fires Jul–Sep.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2024→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 359 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 359 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 March 2024 to 2 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 6 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 1 run (won 0) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 4 runs (won 0) · to 2 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is John & Rhys Flint's strike rate?
- John & Rhys Flint has won 26 of 359 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 7.2% (as at 5 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does John & Rhys Flint do best at?
- Chepstow by strike rate: 12 wins from 77 runners (15.6%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Is John & Rhys Flint in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 6 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is John & Rhys Flint's Fair A/E?
- 0.94, from 357 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.