Aidan Anthony Howard
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 80 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 7% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.08).
The record is strongest at Ballinrobe (16.7%, n=48) and Tipperary (12.1%, n=66) — all clear of the yard's 6.5% baseline. New recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 1.3% (n=78, Fair A/E 0.35). Debutants are the standout value angle: 4% strikes only just below baseline, but Fair A/E 1.75 and +18.00 to a £1 stake over 100 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 2.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.58 and −247.00 to a £1 stake over 348 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Simon Torrens rides 12% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (5.4%, A/E 0.86). The yard also reads well at trips under 6f (12.1%, n=66). 2 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Total Event Rental Novice Chase at Punchestown (Jan 2019, £26,255). The stable star of the record: Enter The Red (IRE) — 7 wins from 73 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Aug–Sep.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,512 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,512 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 16 October 2005 to 1 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Aidan Anthony Howard's strike rate?
- Aidan Anthony Howard has won 94 of 1,441 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 6.5% (as at 4 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Aidan Anthony Howard do best at?
- Ballinrobe by strike rate: 8 wins from 48 runners (16.7%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Aidan Anthony Howard?
- Simon Torrens, with 168 runners since 2008 — 12% of the total. That pairing has won 9 (5.4%).
- Is Aidan Anthony Howard in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 4 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Aidan Anthony Howard's Fair A/E?
- 1.08, from 1,441 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.