Jeremy Scott
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 160 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 13% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.14). With a claiming rider up the record reads 15% (703 runs).
A horse in first-time headgear has been a poor signal at 4.7% (n=129, Fair A/E 0.52). Debutants are the standout value angle: 7.8% strikes only just below baseline, but Fair A/E 1.34 and +17.38 to a £1 stake over 192 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Nick Scholfield rides 27% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (14.9%, A/E 1.17) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (33.3%, n=42). 12 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Unibet Champion Hurdle Challenge Trophy at Cheltenham (Mar 2025, £255,006). The stable star of the record: Dashel Drasher (GB) — 12 wins from 37 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Mar–Apr.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.1% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,108 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,108 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 17 February 2005 to 5 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 10 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 3 runs (won 0) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 4 runs (won 1) · to 5 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Jeremy Scott's strike rate?
- Jeremy Scott has won 404 of 3,075 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 13.1% (as at 9 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Jeremy Scott do best at?
- Fontwell by strike rate: 23 wins from 147 runners (15.6%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Jeremy Scott?
- Nick Scholfield, with 831 runners since 2008 — 27% of the total. That pairing has won 124 (14.9%).
- Is Jeremy Scott in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Jeremy Scott's Fair A/E?
- 1.14, from 3,074 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.