Tim Walford
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sent out around 150 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 10% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.11). Horses with headgear back on after a bare run strike at 27% (34 runs).
It is weakest at Haydock (2.1% over 48 runners) — the widest gap in the record. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a positive signal at 26.5% (n=34, Fair A/E 2.36), but debutants struggle at 1.2% (n=86, Fair A/E 0.30). Horses returning fresh after 61+ days are the standout value angle: 12.1% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.36 and +31.75 to a £1 stake over 174 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Robert Walford rode 24% of the entries and edges the yard's average (12.5% vs 10.2%, A/E 1.30) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also read well off a 0-7-day break (21.6%, n=37). The record read poorly in NH Flat races — 3.3% over 61 runners, 6.9pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the totepool Handicap Chase at Uttoxeter (May 2008, £19,515). The stable star of the record was Zefooha (FR) — 9 wins from 53 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fired Jul–Sep.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 10.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 10.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,281 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,281 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 31 January 2014.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Tim Walford's strike rate?
- Tim Walford has won 111 of 1,084 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 10.2% (as at 8 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Tim Walford do best at?
- Pontefract by strike rate: 9 wins from 52 runners (17.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Tim Walford?
- Robert Walford, with 263 runners since 2008 — 24% of the total. That pairing has won 33 (12.5%).
- What is Tim Walford's Fair A/E?
- 1.11, from 1,078 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.