E Sheehy
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 70 runners a season, winning with 4% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.72). In Group and Graded company the record reads 7% (61 runs).
In Group and Graded company the record reads well at 6.6% (n=61, Fair A/E 0.61), but debutants struggle at 0% (n=128, Fair A/E 0.00). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 1.8% strike, Fair A/E 0.48 and −165.60 to a £1 stake over 278 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Sean Flanagan rides 11% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (4.8%, A/E 0.83). The yard also reads well beyond 3m (11.6%, n=43). The record reads poorly in Flat races — 0.5% over 212 runners, 3pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard in Chase races: Fair A/E 0.82 across 321 runners (6.2% strike, −183.57 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 17 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Kerrygold Champion Chase at Punchestown (Apr 2005, £111,600). The stable star of the record: Justified (IRE) — 8 wins from 24 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Sep–Nov.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 3.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 3.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,210 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,210 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 26 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is E Sheehy's strike rate?
- E Sheehy has won 48 of 1,372 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 3.5% (as at 1 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does E Sheehy do best at?
- Thurles by strike rate: 4 wins from 55 runners (7.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for E Sheehy?
- Sean Flanagan, with 147 runners since 2008 — 11% of the total. That pairing has won 7 (4.8%).
- Is E Sheehy in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is E Sheehy's Fair A/E?
- 0.72, from 1,371 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.